Posts tagged: cigarettes store

Indiana House approves smoking ban

Indianapolis – A statewide smoking ban is on the table again at the Indiana Statehouse.

The House of Representatives voted 54-44 Thursday to impose a statewide smoking ban with just two exceptions: casinos and pari-mutuel horse racing venues or racinos.

“This is something we should have done three years ago, ladies and gentlemen. I don’t think we can wait another year as has been quoted by the president Pro Tem of the Indiana Senate. That is why I want to send it back over there,” said Rep. Charlie Brown (D-Gary).

Brown says secondhand smoke is not good for Indiana. It’s certainly not good for Rep. John Bartlett, who was diagnosed with cancer in 2002.

“It’s a bad feeling. They have affairs for legislators and if I go in and they are smoking, I don’t stay. I don’t want cancer again and I hope no one in this House ever has to hear the doctor say you have cancer,” he said.

Some lawmakers could not support the measure.

“I cannot in good conscience vote for a bill that would prohibit the men and women who died on foreign soil would prevent them from smoking in their VFW Hall if they want it to be that way so I am going to vote no,” said Rep. Jerry Torr (R-Carmel).

“I do believe that we are violating the right of people to invest in a business and determine how they want to run that business if we allow a ban on smoking,” said Rep. Phil Hinkle (R-Indianapolis).

The smoking ban passed by ten votes so the Senate will have the chance to concur with the changes or differ and send it to conference committee to iron out the differences between the bills that passed out of the House and the Senate.

Febrar 26, 2010
By Kevin Rader, Eyewitness News

Davidoff Slims Cigarettes Limited Edition Packs designed by Luisa Beccaria

Davidoff Cigarettes pays tribute to femininity with a new design, elegant and refined, produced in collaboration with fashion designer Luisa Beccaria.

Gold and blue are the colours that have restyled the famous long and narrow pack. Ruches, pleated tulle and embroidery now grace the pack, which has thus been transformed into a style accessory in its own right.

Davidoff Slims Cigarettes, the ultimate in smoking luxury, were created for a demanding and selective female public that love quality and style in all its manifestations. It was for women like this, who wish to stand out from the crowd in every way that the Slims Limited Edition styled by Luisa Beccaria was designed.

Luisa Beccaria’s maison stands for “Made in Italy” excellence, the magic and elegance of sartorial fashion, the glamour of Hollywood stars. “We’re really excited about this collaboration with Luisa Beccaria. With these packs she’s captured and enhanced the sophisticated style of Davidoff Slims,” said Muhannad Jabi the General Manager of Imperial Tobacco M.E. – the owners of Davidoff Cigarettes.

While Luisa Beccaria said she was “honoured that Davidoff Cigarettes came to me for this collaboration. It was great fun rethinking design patterns for these packs instead of for fabric”.

The Davidoff Slims Cigarettes styled by Luisa Beccaria are available as an international limited edition.

The Davidoff Slims Cigarettes Limited Edition styled by Luisa Beccaria will be available to view and purchase in Kuwait in January 2010.

© 2010 Al Bawaba

SF Officials Back Initiative of Dramatic Cut in the Number of Tobacco Shops

Smokers are sick and tired while business owners are simply devastated hearing the news about shocking offer to reduce tobacco storethe number of authorized tobacco stores throughout San Francisco..

Beginning from 2004, convenience stores seeking to sell tobacco products had to apply for a special license. The procedure of certification was established so that fiscal agencies could track those stores and fine those of them where adolescents were found to purchase tobacco products.

Nevertheless, as anti-smoking organizations state, currently there are too many licensed tobacco vendors in the City, and particularly in low-income neighborhoods. Therefore, they have drafted an ordinance to reduce the number of certified tobacco sellers.

According to the introduced ordinance, there will be a limit of 35 certified retailers in every district, what accounts for 385 stores permitted to sell tobacco in San Francisco. In conformity with the Department of Small Business report, 1,097 shops currently have valid tobacco license, so reducing this number to 385 would hurt 60 percent of current businesses.

The authors of the ordinance suggest that current licenses would not be terminated, but just not renewed after they are expired. Thus, the number of licensed shops would reach the desired limit of 35. Moreover, according to the proposal, the license will be annulled automatically if the shop is sold to other individual.

Many public health groups have already expressed they support to the ordinance, stating that though it could affect businesses and adult smokers, it would be beneficial for children, protecting them from the appeals of tobacco industry.

The bill is currently pending in the local Health Committee, and has not received any support from the Board of Supervisors.

The opponents of the ordinance, mainly business owners argue that it would destroy their businesses and deprive them from their honest livelihood.

For the major part of small stores, tobacco products account for nearly 30 percent of all profits, says Jim Kadagly, chairman of Arab-American Association of store owners. The association has introduced the amended ordinance, which bans new licenses but allows license transfer to new store owners.

Kadagly claimed that in case Board of Supervisors adopted the initial ordinance, it would ruin small stores.

Meantime, Head of the Department of Small Business Angela Brown said that even if the bill is adopted, and there will be no tobacco licenses any more, the Department would elaborate subsidiary programs for the shops to compensate lost profits.

Limiting the number of licenses is the latest step in the war with smoking initiated by San Francisco in the last couple of years.

This summer, San Francisco became the first City across the U.S. to impose a 20-cent tax collected on each cigarette pack in order to clean the city from cigarette-related litter.

Under another ordinance, now pending in one of the Committees, smoking on outside patios and near restaurants, parks and athletic events will also be banned.

Stores mull options on tobacco law

A grocery chain and a pharmacy company say they’re looking at pulling cigarettes from their shelves in light of a new law to crack down on tobacco sales.

Proposed anti-tobacco legislation received first reading in the Saskatchewan legislature on Wednesday.

The law, which has yet to be passed but could take effect as early as next year, would make it illegal to smoke in a car if there are children present.

It would also put new restrictions on tobacco sales. If pharmacies and stores that have pharmacies inside — such as supermarkets — want to continue selling tobacco, they are going to have to build separate areas or kiosks, to which minors will not have access.

In response, some stores were saying Wednesday they would rather just stop selling tobacco altogether.

John Graham, Canada Safeway’s public affairs manager, said when similar legislation was introduced years ago in Ontario, Safeway decided to spend the money to revamp only two stores. In the rest, they pulled tobacco altogether, he said.

“Kiosks, though we wouldn’t rule them out, aren’t most likely the path we would choose to take,” Graham said.

Clint Mahlman, the senior vice-president of London Drugs, said his company won’t be building kiosks either.

He said the law won’t help people quit smoking: people who can’t get cigarettes at a drug store will get them elsewhere.

On the other hand, a drug store is an appropriate place to sell tobacco, because it’s where people can buy anti-smoking aids and receive advice from staff about them, Mahlman said.

“Targeting tobacco customers when they’re purchasing tobacco is the most effective way to get our smoking cessation methods across to the tobacco user,” he said.

When a tobacco ban was implemented in Alberta earlier this year, London Drugs saw the sale of stop-smoking aids drop dramatically, he said.

Health Minister Don McMorris said Wednesday that many drug stores in Saskatchewan have already stopped selling cigarettes.

The proposed law would also ban smoking on school grounds.

Saskatchewan law currently prohibits smoking in workplaces and many public enclosed areas, including bars, restaurants and curling rinks.
December 3, 2009 Cbc

Grass Valley to reconsider licensing tobacco retailers

A proposed ordinance regulating stores that sell tobacco will be back before the Grass Valley City Council Tuesday.

The council first discussed the issue at its Sept. 22 meeting, but voted unanimously to send the proposal back to city staff to work out a schedule for fines for those who sell tobacco to minors.

While retailers were supportive of the idea to limit the sale of tobacco products to those under the age of 18, many had balked when faced with the prospect of additional fees for a city license.

Police Chief John Foster said in September that a fee for licensing would allow his department to spend the money and staff time necessary to perform yearly inspections of the more than 35 tobacco retailers in Grass Valley.

Customers must be 18 to purchase tobacco products in California, though Grass Valley leaders say there’s little enforcement against those who violate the law. The Nevada County Tobacco Use Prevention Youth and Adult Coalition performed a use survey in 2008 in which underage youths attempted to purchase tobacco from 28 stores in the Grass Valley city limits; two stores sold products to minors.

The proposed ordinance would take effect Jan. 31, 2010 and the annual license fee would be set at $100.

The ordinance would prohibit a license from being issued for a period of one year following the revocation of a license and sets a minimum of one compliance check a year that will be modeled after the state Alcohol Beverage Control Board program. More detailed information was added to the ordinance to clarify penalties and suspension time frames.

If passed, Grass Valley would join Nevada City with a retail tobacco ordinance; Nevada City passed its ordinance in 2006.

An infill study for the commercial portion of the Glenbrook basin also is on the council agenda.

The city is using a Planning and Technical Assistance grant of $35,000 and nearly $9,000 in program income funds to pay for the study, which is intended to determine future development and job creation opportunities in the area.

Key areas of the basin will be studied for their potential to absorb additional development. The consultant will conduct stakeholder interviews and hold two public workshops.

The council is expected to approve a contract agreement with Berkeley-based consultant Wahlstrom & Associates to complete the study for $33,250.

The study will kick off in January, with public workshops scheduled in June. The study is to be completed and presented to the council in August 2010.

The city council meets at 7 p.m. today in council chambers, Grass Valley City Hall, 125 East Main St.

By Liz Kellar, Theunion

Cigarette Tax In Florida Hurting Sales

The $1-per-pack tax on cigarettes in Florida that hit in July may be responsible for a sharp decline in sales, the Tampa Bay Fox News affiliate reported.

State figures show that sales dropped 26% between July and September, compared to the same three months the year before.

Dora Casler, a long-time c-store employee, who has been selling cigarettes since 1988, told the news station she thinks 90% of her customers are trying to quit.

“One way or another-they are trying to quit. With the patch, with the help of a doctor, hypnotist-they’re trying any way they can to break the habit,” Casler said.

She said when federal taxes increased in January, she saw the results right away and when the $1-per-pack kicked in July 1, customers started switching to less expensive brands. The cheapest cigarettes in Florida run t $3.49 a pack, compared with $8 a pack for the most expensive brands.

The drop over the three-month period equates to 81 million fewer packs sold, which also means revenue projections are off by $81 million.

“Doesn’t bother me a bit,” State Senator Dennis Jones of Seminole, who chairs one of the committees that approved the tax, told Fox News. “If the tax revenues come down on the one side as far as collections, our Medicaid costs on respiratory illnesses also reduce on the other side.”



November 18, 2009 Csdecisions

Imperial Tobacco chief to step down

Gareth Davis, chief executive of Imperial Tobacco, confirmed on Tuesday that he would stand down after more than 37 years at the cigarette company.

One of the longest-serving chief executives of a FTSE 100 company, Mr Davis will retire close to his 60th birthday next May to be replaced by Alison Cooper, chief operating officer, who will become one of the few women to head a UK blue-chip company.

“I’ll have been at the helm for 14 years – the time is right for me to move on,” said Mr Davis.

He signed off on high note on Tuesday with slightly better-than-expected full-year results, the first that allow the market to gauge organic growth since the group completed the €12.6bn takeover of Franco-Spanish rival Altadis.

With a 40 per cent rise in “adjusted” pre-tax profit and a recommended final dividend of 52p, bringing the total for the year to 73p, up 15.6 per cent from last year’s total of 63.1p.

Mr Davis said the 12 months to the end of September had been “a particularly good year”.

Under his stewardship, Imperial shares, worth less than £4 little more than a decade ago, rose to as much as £27 last year.

Mr Davis indicated Ms Cooper, a 43-year-old who joined Imperial from PwC in 1999, would be more likely to “tweak” the company’s strategy rather than to revolutionise it. “Are we going to turn this strategy on its head? Of course we’re not,” he said.

Still, the chief executive-in waiting said her ambition was to make the company “equally well known for sales growth” as it was for “cost control”.

Concerns over Imperial’s borrowings and slow organic growth have dragged on the shares this year, which have underperformed relative to the market and peers.

But they rose 27p or 1.5 per cent in early Tuesday morning trading in the wake of the results.

Pre-tax profit rose from £621m to £945m on revenue of £26.5bn, up from £20.5bn last year. Earnings per share were 65.5p compared to 50.6p a year ago.


By Alistair Gray
November 10 2009, FT.com

Businesses cited for allowing smoking

WOOD RIVER – Health officials are cracking down on Madison County bar owners who continue to allow smokers to light up indoors despite a nearly 2-year-old statewide ban.

A Worden establishment was the first in the county to pay a fine for violating the Smoke Free Illinois Act. The law prohibits smoking at indoor public places, such as bars and restaurants.

The Madison County Health Department would not release the name of the bar that paid the fine. The Telegraph filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act last week and is awaiting a response as to which establishment paid the citation.

During a Health Department Committee meeting in September, Mary Cooper, the county’s emergency health manager, confirmed a $250 fine was paid.

Kelly Jakubek, spokeswoman for the Illinois Department of Public Health, said a second establishment was cited in Madison County; however, rather than pay the fine, the business requested an administrative hearing with the IDPH to dispute the violation. She said American Legion Post 365 in Collinsville was issued a smoking violation on Sept. 2, and a hearing has been scheduled for Nov. 10.

Jakubek said that any person may register a complaint about illegal smoking with the IDPH, a state-certified local public health department or a local law enforcement agency. The Smoke Free Illinois Act states that the agencies may investigate any complaint and, if necessary, assess fines if they find an individual or establishment is in violation.

Fines for individuals range from $100 to $250; fines for business or places of employment range from $250 to $2,500.

If a business is issued a citation, the violator can pay the fine without objection or contest it. If the owner/manager objects, they then are scheduled to go before an administrative hearing.

Cooper said that the Health Department has started issuing citations to establishments where people are caught smoking inside.

“A sanitarian has to actually see someone smoking before a citation can be issued,” Cooper said.

Until recently, Cooper said, only warning letters were sent to businesses named in complaints received by the IDPH.

“We now have the authority to issue fines, where when the law first was passed, we didn’t,” Cooper said.

In February, the state amended the ban that first went into place on Jan. 1, 2008, to include enforcement of citations.

Health officials said most businesses are adhering to the law, and many have gone out of their way to build outdoor areas to accommodate smokers. Complaints still are filed regularly about establishments that allow people to smoke inside, especially those with no patio area.

During warmer weather, Cooper said, there have been fewer calls made about smokers inside, probably because patrons don’t mind stepping out to light up. She said people are less likely to step outside in cold weather.

She said that if a complaint is filed about a business, sanitarians will go and inspect.

“We are going in after hours, not just during the day,” she said.

Jakubek said since the law was amended, there have been nine hearings requested throughout the state for businesses that were cited for smoking indoors.

To file a complaint, the public can call the IDPH’s toll-free number, (866) 973-4646, or visit www.smoke-freeillinois.gov to send information.

Visit http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?Name=095-1029 to find out more about the Illinois Smoke Free Act.


cynthia_ellis@thetelegraph.com
By CYNTHIA M. ELLIS
The Telegraph

Push to derail smoking ban begins

A coalition of merchants and organizations in St. Louis County announced its opposition today to Proposition N, which would ban smoking in most public places throughout the county.

More than a half dozen representatives and owners of bars, restaurants, tobacco shops, bowling alleys and others said they had formed a campaign committee and planned to spend money to fight the proposed ban on the Nov. 3 ballot. The “Citizens Against Proposition N” committee contends that a smoking ban would have a negative impact on county businesses and result in a loss of freedom for owners and smokers.

Jon Rand, president of Discount Smoke Shops, said that businesses are closing already because of the poor economy. He said that as long as neighboring counties do not have smoking bans, St. Louis County businesses could be hurt by a ban and that tax revenue and jobs would decline.

“Why would you want to drive business from one county to another – put jobs in jeopardy – during a time like this?” Rand said at a news conference called by the ban’s organized opponents.

The ban would prohibit smoking in indoor public areas countywide except on casino floors, in smoking lounges at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport and in bars that have incomes from food at 25 percent or less of gross income. If voters approve, the ban would take effect on Jan. 2, 2011.

Supporters of Proposition N have formed their own committee, County Citizens for Cleaner Air. That group says that a smoking ban in public places is essential for public health and would save lives. It would be good for citizens, for workers, businesses and families, they say.

Advocates of a ban say also that the St. Louis area and Missouri lag far behind most of the rest of the country in adopting bans. Only Clayton, Ballwin and Arnold have adopted bans and a ban is on the ballot in Kirkwood in November. Other Missouri cities with bans include Kansas City, Columbia and Springfield. Illinois has a statewide ban.

At the news conference today called by local ban opponents, Fred Teutenberg. president of Fred’s Cheapo Depot and formerly with Dirt Cheap, predicted St. Louis County businesses and tax dollars would head to St. Charles and Jefferson counties if voters approved the ban.

“Each individual bar and restaurant owner should be able to make their own decision based on what will please their customers,” he said.

Gerard Ezvan, owner of Jon’s Pipe Shop in Clayton and a native of France who became an American citizen, said: “A smoking ban would diminish personal freedom. It would also hurt the business I have spent many years building up.”

Rev. Harold Hendrick of the Bott Radio Network denounced what he said was an “unfair and discriminatory exemption” to the ban to benefit casino gambling floors. He said St. Louis County government was “coddling casinos.”

“Once again, government has caved in to predatory casinos,” he said.


By Margaret Gillerman
10.14.2009

Smoke-Shop Signals of the Unkechaug

What began in 1700 as a deed for 175 acres had already been reduced by the time Jefferson visited to the slice it occupies today. Most of the land was lost in 1730, when the Indians handed over 100 acres “in consideration of twenty Dutch blankets, four barrels of cider, and a sum of three pounds.”

Thus the scene at Squaw Lane, which is the tribe’s main source of revenue. The street is chockablock with smoke shops with pastel vinyl awnings: Geronimo’s, Tammy’s, Princess Rainbow Smoke Shop, the Peace Pipe Smoke Shop. “All of these buildings here have been impacted in a positive way by the business,” Wallace said, pointing out some of the over 80 homes that have been renovated or replaced—modular for mobile—in the last year. “The real story is what’s happening, the transformation of what’s happening in this community.”

Mayor Bloomberg, along with Representative Peter King, wrote an August 4, 2008, editorial arguing that cigarette sales on reservations should be taxed—one line insinuated that cigarette-smuggling money might go to terrorists. Chief Wallace is still riled about it. “We got blamed for the MTA deficit! Phenomenal, man. Supporting terrorism. It upsets me because this is our land, whether we occupy it or not. It’s still our land, and we defend our homeland against all enemies, domestic and foreign.”

When Thomas Jefferson visited the “Unquachog Indians,” in June 1791, he noted that the tribe “constitute the Pufspatock Settlement in the town of Brookhaven, South Side of Long Island.” The settlement was conveniently located in the backyard of his friend William Floyd’s plantation, where Jefferson and his longtime wingman James Madison happened to be crashing. Jefferson made an effort to document the language of the tribe, many of whose members tilled his host’s fields: “Cow … Cowsen; Horse … Hofses; Sheep … Sheeps; to cut with an axe … poquetahaman; handsome … worecco; ugly … nechowuchayuk.” He concluded: “There remain but three persons of this tribe who can speak its language: They are old women, from two of these, brought together, this vocabulary was taken, a young woman of the same tribe was also present who knew something of the language.”

Harry Wallace, the current chief of the Unkechaug Indian Nation, trying to learn at least an approximation of his native tongue, has an Algonquian-language app on his iPhone. “I’m gettin’ there,” he said from behind a large cluttered desk in his office, a small cedar-paneled lodge set behind Poospatuck Smoke Shop and Trading Company in Mastic, Long Island. It was early August; 65 miles away on Manhattan Island, Mike Bloomberg—modern-day equivalent of the Great White Father—was not happy with Chief Wallace and the Unkechaug. This is because the chief and his tribe were making big bucks selling millions of packs of cigarettes tax-free, many of these to residents of New York City, which imposes a $1.50-per-pack tax of its own. Exactly how many New Yorkers were getting smokes under cover of the Unkechaug is not easy to answer. An Independent Budget Office report estimated that in 2006, around 207 million packs were bought by city smokers. No tax was paid on a quarter of these (only a fraction of the untaxed smokes were bought on Indian reservations). But Bloomberg has declared war on smoking, and wherever there is smoke, he wants his cut. So last September, the city filed a motion in federal court against a group of Unkechaug retailers, claiming hundreds of millions in lost city tax revenue.

Wallace was still recovering from last night’s “sweat”—several important dudes, dome-shaped lodge, a pit of hot rocks in the middle, much perspiration, a prayer song or two—at an undisclosed location. It was the culmination of a week of mourning for Benny Miller, a 22-year-old tribe member who died in a motorcycle accident. His death mobilized Unkechaug near and far to return to the reservation, to mourn and sing: the honor song during the wake, the various burial and prayer songs throughout.

Geronimo’s refrain, “They’re not satisfied until they get all of it,” is never far from Chief Wallace’s mind. But signals were still pointing toward victory for the Unkechaug: Only weeks prior, a New York State Appellate Court ruled that the Cayuga Indian Nation could continue selling untaxed cigarettes to non-Indians. He pushed a button on a speakerphone connected to the smoke shop. “Can I get two cups of coffee in here?” he said in a baritone. The chief is 55, broad-shouldered, and has long thick salt-and-pepper hair, which he wears in a tight ponytail. Various New York State Bar plaques line the walls. It was Wallace who opened the first smoke shop back in 1991, with the intention of making a little money, sure, but as a declaration too—the Unkechaug’s sovereign right to exploit whatever economic advantages the Indians’ sovereignty affords.

The Unkechaugs, like all recognized tribes, are exempt from state and many federal taxes, but beyond this their economic status is murkier, based on whatever arrangement the state and the Indians can agree on. In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that New York is entitled to collect taxes on Indian sales of cigarettes and motor fuel to non-Indians. Coming up with a way of enforcing that tax has been the trouble.

Their tribal rights have been questioned before, in various ways. Among the papers on the chief’s cluttered desk was a folded-up family tree. In 2006, Gristedes Food Inc. filed a suit—almost all of it since dismissed—questioning the legitimacy of the residents’ native heritage. Gristedes claimed that Unkechaug vendors, located some 65 miles from their nearest supermarket, were unfairly cutting into their profits. Fortunately, the tribe keeps excellent records. The first time such an accusation was made was back in 1935, when publishing scion and notorious cad William Shepherd Dana bought the Floyd estate and claimed that the tribe were, essentially, squatters.

The chief laid out the genealogy for me. “So you start with me, Harry Wallace,” he said, consulting the family tree before him. “Then it went to my mother, Lydia Anne Davis, and then it went to her parents, Charles Davis and Lydia Anne Davis. My grandmother has the same name.” He paused and looked up over his reading glasses, then rattled through a few more names. “Now, Sylvie Hicks and Jerusha Lott were sisters. Their mother was Sybel Lott, and Sybel Lott—we have historical documents—was from a very prominent Indian family.” She was a direct descendant of Chief Nowedonah, and Wallace believes it’s a good bet she was one of the elderly women Jefferson spoke to.

“Up until recently, the role of chief was more of a spokesperson and a leader in ceremonies, in powwows and June meetings and such,” Wallace said. But that was before the cigarette trade, which has burgeoned as the taxes charged by the state and the city—$2.75 per pack to the state; $1.50 to the city—have driven people to stock up on tax-free Camel Lights in Poospatuck country.

Along with revenue, the cigarette business has also occasioned crime, something Bloomberg has been at pains to highlight. In 1997, in a meeting of the tribal council to discuss a $.25-per-pack levy on smoke shops, three men in masks barged in, brandishing firearms, pointing them at the chief’s head.

In the next few years, a man named Rodney Morrison, not an Unkechaug himself but married to one, was charged with firebombing the car of a rival smoke-shop proprietor and the murder of another. Though he was acquitted of those charges, in 2004 he was arrested (and eventually convicted) of a racketeering conspiracy involving black-market cigarettes.

The State Department of Taxation and Finance says that in 2007, 11.3 million cartons changed hands on the reservation. That’s more than 25 times the number reported a decade before, and, if the numbers are correct (the chief says they are not), over $11 million in revenue for the tribal council—not a bad return on 55 acres in Mastic.

Chief Wallace took a cigarette from a pack of Nat Sherman New York Cut, sank back in his chair, and provided a different economic narrative. “Here’s one that got $1,000. Whoa, this one’s a star, she got $1,300,” he said, reading off the names of reservation students who would be receiving gift certificates for their academic performance the previous school year. There is also a modest reward for attendance. In the past year, the tribe has spent $200,000 on education, paying 25 percent of tuition for the 40 Unkechaug students currently enrolled in colleges around the country.

After a while, we climbed into his red Cadillac. “The only thing you need from the white man is a car, because a car is faster than a horse,” he said. Driving through the reservation: It’s hard to see beyond the smoke shops to take in whatever natural beauty exists on the river banks. Neon signs offer competitive prices, creating tough decisions for customers to contemplate from pickup trucks whose idling engines are joined by the buzz of the renegade ATVs giddily weaving about the traffic, as if to remind you, in case you happened to forget: You’re in Indian country now.
tobacco shop

“The goal here is not to stop us from selling cigarettes,” Chief Wallace said. “It’s to try and destroy us as a people.”

The settlement, located in the hamlet of Mastic, a few miles west of Westhampton, between Carmans River and the Forge River, was once an ideal location for hunting right whales. According to historian John A. Strong, of Long Island University, the Unkechaug were famous for their skill at whaling. Don’t get the chief started on the whaling business. Sovereignty, his wounded knee! “In 1676, our people attempted to establish their own independent whaling company,” he began. “We had the best whalers. We decided to gather up all of our skilled harpoonists and whalers and formulate our own company. There’s a documented history of complaint to the colonial governor of New York that the settlers in the towns were interfering with our company, trying to take away whales that we captured, destroy our boats. All these things were in an effort to prevent us from establishing an independent, economically viable enterprise. Sixteen-seventy-six. How many years ago was that?”

Harry Wallace grew up in Queens, but made regular visits to his uncle on the reservation, which was in bad shape at that time; a 1967 government report concluded that the living conditions were worse than those of migrant farmworkers in California. Harry ended up at Dartmouth—the first in his family to attend college. The first day he got there, some football player started calling him names. Harry knocked him silly. “He messed with the wrong guy,” he said. The football team, as well as other sports teams, were known as the Dartmouth Indians, but Wallace led a successful campaign to change the name—now the teams are known as Big Green. After Dartmouth, Wallace attended New York Law School. He spent the eighties as an attorney in Manhattan, working on things like personal injury, landlord-tenant disputes. But there was work to do on the reservation.

There is no landlord, per se, on the 55 acres between Eleanor Avenue and Poospatuck Lane—it’s communal property owned by the tribe, not any individual. What land is left cannot be sold. But residents aren’t able to use their land as an asset to get a loan, to fix that leaky roof. And sovereignty also means responsibility for your own municipalities: telephone poles, road maintenance, running water are provided for largely by the tribe itself.
On August 25 of this year, a federal-court judge in Brooklyn handed down a verdict addressing the Unkechaug’s motion to dismiss. Federal Judge Carol Amon denied the motion and ruled that the state appellate court had misinterpreted the law in question. She ruled that regular tax law indeed applied to the tobacco trade on Indian reservations, as it does everywhere in the state. She issued a temporary injunction banning all further cigarette sales at four stores identified in the city’s suit. Chief Wallace and the Unkechaug appealed. On September 25, the court announced that though the appeal would be heard, the injunction would continue. But that leaves ten other smoke shops in the Poospatuck reservation, and the cars are still backed up around Squaw Lane. “The city will go after every dollar that is owed to city taxpayers,” said Bloomberg in a statement.

Wallace is far from ready to smoke the peace pipe, however. He says it’s the same as it was with whaling in the seventeenth century. “The goal here is not to stop us from selling cigarettes,” Chief Wallace said. “It’s to try and destroy us as a people, because every effort that we made to resolve these things has met with resistance. They don’t want to do it. They want to take it as far as they can to try and kill us.

“They need a scapegoat for not blaming his friends on Wall Street,” said the chief, his tone slowly rising. He began pacing in circles, literally hopping mad. “Who is a convenient scapegoat? The smallest tribe in New York, selling a demonic product—that’s a good scapegoat.”


By Spencer Morgan Oct 4, 2009 Nymag

State’s Tobacco Industry Helped Avert New Pennsylvania Tax

HARRISBURG, Pa. ― Pennsylvania is poised to maintain a long-standing tax exemption on the sales of cigars and smokeless tobacco, despite two attempts by Gov. Ed Rendell over the past three years to remove it.

Even though all other states tax the items, such a tax is not expected to appear in a nearly week-old budget agreement that is still being hammered into shape in the Capitol.

Earlier this year, Rendell proposed the tax to help wipe out the state’s multibillion-dollar revenue shortfall. His attempt in 2007 would have helped underwrite an extension of state-subsidized health insurance to adults who lack coverage.

Resistance by Pennsylvania’s legislators can be attributed to their desire to protect tobacco growers in southeastern Pennsylvania, cigar makers that employ hundreds and heavy use of snuff and chewing tobacco by miners and steelworkers in southwestern Pennsylvania.

“That would be a very unpopular tax in my communities,” said Sen. Richard Kasunic, D-Fayette. “And I’d rather not have to vote on that.”

In addition, Pennsylvania is home to four of the nation’s eight leading cigar retailers. One, Cigars International of Bethlehem, would have to consider moving to Florida if Pennsylvania approved a tax on cigars, company president Keith Meier told the Senate Finance Committee at a February hearing on Rendell’s proposal.

Legislative leaders did, however, agree to extend a new tax on games of chance played by clubs and nonprofits with liquor licenses and tickets for cultural institutions and performing arts events.

They also agreed to raise the tax on cigarettes by a quarter to $1.60 per pack while introducing that tax onto the growing sales of little cigars called cigarillos, which are not made in Pennsylvania and compete with cigars.

Public health groups argued that extending the tax to cigars and smokeless tobacco would be good public policy and a substantial source of revenue if the tax were to be commensurate with the one imposed on cigarettes.

But Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Jake Corman, R-Centre, said many of his colleagues did not think the $50 million that could be raised under Rendell’s proposal was worth it.

© 2009

City mulls limits on tobacco, alcohol shops

SANDY — Concerned about alcohol and tobacco sales near schools, the Sandy City Council is considering a zoning ordinance that could limit where new stores that sell such items are located.

The elected officials voted unanimously Tuesday on “pending ordinance doctrine,” effectively a moratorium on permits for new retail shops that sell primarily age-restricted material.

Councilman Chris McCandless explained that he wanted the city to remain family-friendly.

“The concern is that we don’t overload our businesses with specific kinds of business,” McCandless said.

City attorney Walter Miller said the ordinance could also restrict businesses that sell alcohol and tobacco around Rio Tinto Stadium.

Now, the Planning Commission and planning staff will study what other cities have done about regulation of tobacco and alcohol businesses, according to Sandy spokesman Nick Duerkson. The staff will present legal language to the commission, which will then make a recommendation to the City Council.

The moratorium expires at the end of the year.

“If you have to be 19 to go into a smoke shop, is it good to have that right next door to where the average age is 13?” Duerkson asked. “Maybe that’s not a good idea.”

Duerkson said state law leaves it up to cities to regulate the location of beer and tobacco businesses.
Story continues below

Incidentally, a new pipe and tobacco shop in Sandy is drawing heat from neighbors who think it’s too near Union Middle School at about 700 East and 1300 South. Residents want the shop’s business license revoked but may be out of luck because the license was granted before Tuesday’s vote.

An owner of the House of Hookah store said he doesn’t sell tobacco to minors and was recently awarded by the police department for checking age identification. The man, who refused to provide his name to the Deseret News, said nothing illegal is sold in his shop.

Meanwhile, the Sandy City Council wants something done about such shops — and quickly.

“We shouldn’t allow minors inside those types of facilities if their primary resource is drug paraphernalia,” McCandless said.

In addition to selling glass pipes, the shop sells cigarettes, sunglasses, soda, incense, hookahs and hookah tobacco.

Copyright © Sept. 8, 2009 Deseretnews

Bar owner plans second annual smoke-in

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Controversial bar owner Kerry “Paco” Ellison is planning his second-annual smokers’ celebration at his Charleston bar.

Ellison, owner of the Blackhawk Saloon in Charleston, said the second-annual smokers’ night activities begin at 4 p.m. Wednesday at the saloon.

Ellison and his clientele have flouted Kanawha County’s indoor smoking ban since the regulations barring smoking at bars and gambling establishments went into effect last year. Ellison was convicted in Kanawha Magistrate Court of disobeying the ordinance, but an appeal is pending in Kanawha Circuit Court.

Ellison doesn’t know how long he can successfully fight the smoking ban, though he says people have been smoking at the Blackhawk since the Kanawha-Charleston Health Department put the clean indoor air ordinance into effect in July 2008.

“You can only kick that dog so many times before he’ll bite you,” Ellison said. “But I think I’ve proven over the past year that the dog ain’t got no teeth.”

August 17, 2009
Copyright © 2009 Wvgazette

Japan’s Convenience Store Sales Fall on Cigarettes

Japan’s convenience-store sales in June fell for the first time in 14 months, as customers spent less on cigarettes and lunchbox meals.


Sales at stores open more than a year dropped 2.3 percent to 605.9 billion yen ($6.44 billion), the Japan Franchise Association said in a statement today. Department store sales fell 8.8 percent in June, capping the worst half-year performance, the Japan Department Stores Association said in a separate release today.

Consumers in Japan, the world’s second-largest economy, have cut back on spending as unemployment rose to a five-year high and wages fell for the 12th straight month in May. Sales at convenience stores last year were also boosted with the introduction of an age verification card for vending-machine purchases of cigarettes, which increased customer traffic at chains including Seven & I Holdings Co.’s 7-Eleven and Lawson Inc.’s outlets.

“The initial spike in cigarette sales following the introduction of electronic age-verification cigarette machines is over, particularly in western Japan,” said Miki Ichikawa, a spokeswoman at the convenience store association.

Sales per customer at the convenience stores declined 4.8 percent, the largest in seven months, the statement said. Weak sales of prepared meals contributed to the drop.
Copyright © 2009 Bloomberg

Small stores pay out as Ireland goes dark

Hundreds of small independent retailers in Ireland have had to pay in full for costly alterations to their tobacco gantries after a ban on display came into force on July 1.

Contrary to anti-smoking lobby group claims, tobacco manufacturers declined to assist smaller retailers with the expensive alterations, which require their products to be stored out of view in closed containers accessible only by staff.

The lack of financial support offers little comfort to UK shopkeepers who are awaiting a Commons decision on the display ban this week.

Large stores and supermarkets which sell greater volumes of tobacco are understood to have received some funding for the changes, which also apply to in-store vending machines.

Vincent Jennings, chief executive of the Convenience Stores and Newsagents Association (CSNA) in Ireland, said that many small retailers had found the costs hard to bear. “We had been hoping until the very last minute that small stores would receive some financial assistance but unfortunately for many this has not been the case,” he said.

Jennings added that stores had been slowly removing the bright gantry panels and lights since January to get shoppers used to the concept as the July 1 deadline approached. They had opted for a variety of different solutions, from coffin style boxes under the counter to gantries with drawers, he revealed.

Retailers are permitted to display one sign in their store informing the public that tobacco products are for sale in their stores to those over 18 years of age. However, no other signs which use the word ‘tobacco’ – even in reference to an age-restricted goods policy – are allowed.

The law also requires all tobacco retailers to register with the Office of Tobacco Control at a cost of 50 Euros – a fixed fee irrespective of the size of the store.


Copyright © 2009 Thegrocer

Amendment of tobacco bill

Fine Gael is calling on the Government to amend the Public Health Amendment of Tobacco Bill to ensure there are appropriate penalties for shopkeepers who sell tobacco and cigarettes to minors.

The party says the maximum penalty of 90 days suspension which is discretionary should be made mandatory.

Spokesperson on Health Dr James Reilly said the Government’s intention to leave this penalty at the discretion of judges, sends out the wrong signal.

Deputy Reilly has told the Dáil that store owners should not be allowed to use the excuse of ignorance where employees sell cigarettes to minors.

Old Tobacco Warehouse Is Now A Train Station

The sun was barely peaking over Durham’s skyline when Cora Vincent rolled her blue suitcase from her sister’s truck into the city’s brand-new train station.

“The ceiling … I love the ceiling,” she said as she looked up with a smile. “The ceiling reminds me of the barn we used to put tobacco in.”

Vincent was the first passenger ever to step foot into the newly renovated Walker Warehouse Building at 601 W. Main St. Almost exactly a year ago, crews started converting the old tobacco warehouse into a renovated 10,000 square foot Amtrak station.

“Because Durham is the 5th busiest station in the state, certainly we needed more room,” said Joan Bagherpour, Communications Manager for the North Carolina Department of Transportation Rail Division.

Bagherpour said 50,000 passengers got on and off of trains here in Durham last year. Their surroundings were not quite this plush, however.

“The interim station, which was about 1,000 square feet has been in operation since 1996,” she explained.

You can still see that temporary station right across the tracks from the new platform.

“The business of the station was a really wonderful addition to the downtown revitalization of downtown Durham,” Bagherpour said.

The canopy and platform cost about $1.2 million. The “adaptive reuse” of the interior came with a $1 million price tag. Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds paired with NC DOT “Moving Ahead” funds paid for the project.

“It’s certainly a greener way to travel,” Bagherpour said. “With our Piedmont train, it’s auto competitive. From Raleigh to Charlotte … it’s about three hours; pretty much the same as it would be in a car.”

That’s the 7:22 a.m. train that Cora Vincent was taking this morning as she went back to her home in Charlotte. She doesn’t drive. Years ago, Vincent left the tobacco fields of North Carolina and moved to New York City. She said there was never really any reason for her to drive since.

“You can relax; you can walk; you don’t have to sit the whole time,” she said as she got ready to board her train home.


Copyright © 2009 Mync

Dutch bar owners win new victory in fight against smoking ban

Dutch bar owners won a new victory in their fight against a smoking ban on their premises when an appeal court cleared two of them of breaking the law and quashed a 1,200 euro fine.

“The law contains no formal obligation for landlords of cafes, restaurants and hotels without staff to implement a smoking ban,” the appeal court at Leeuwarden in the northern Netherlands said in a statement.

It overturned the verdict handed down in a lower court against the pair from Groningen who became the first to be prosecuted following the introduction of the nationwide ban a year ago.

In May the appeals court of Den Bosch, in the southern Netherlands, upheld the acquittal of the two owners of the Victoria cafe in Breda, near the Belgian border.

“The court finds that the (ban) is partly non-binding, as it lacks legal grounding” regarding establishments with no staff, said a court statement.

The ban on smoking in the hotel, restaurant and catering industry had sought to protect staff from the dangers of second-hand smoke inhalation.

Several thousand small bars and cafes in the Netherlands united late last year to defy the smoking ban and create a joint legal defence fund, arguing they lacked the floor space and money to erect separate smoking-only areas.

A recent Dutch health ministry study found that 62 percent of Dutch cafes saw a drop in business in October and November 2008, compared with a year earlier, on account of the smoking ban.

As tobacco fades


As a North Carolina native and descendant of William Winston, who came into port at Jamestown, Va., in the late 1600s, I am a representative of a tobacco farming family that goes back nearly to the beginning of Britain’s tobacco trade in the “New World.”

If John Rolfe hadn’t gotten some seeds from the Caribbean of what we tobacco farmers lovingly call “The Golden Leaf” and planted them in Virginia, America as we know her would not even be here.

Now, I am allergic to tobacco smoke and will be quite comfortable in places without having to breathe it, but I would be remiss, as would North Carolina and the rest of America, if we did not recognize the positive effects tobacco has had on our economy. Tobacco has built, and in the case of the South after the Civil War, rebuilt America. Our roads, our schools (if you look at the decline of tobacco, you could possibly find a correlation with our inability to keep up with school populations) and all the transplants working out in the RTP have tobacco to thank.

We must find something else with which to compete globally if we expect to build our country back up again with everyone eagerly lining up to hammer nails into the coffin of tobacco.

Smokers, retailers upset with cigarette tax proposal


Smokers have a clear message they want to send to lawmakers about upping the cigarette tax: Don’t do it.

The Legislature is considering raising New Hampshire’s cigarette tax by 45 cents a pack to help patch a $650 million revenue gap. If the bill passes, New Hampshire’s tax would be $1.78 per pack.

New Hampshire would remain the cheapest state in New England to buy cigarettes even if lawmakers pass the 45-cent increase, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

But the gap would certainly be narrowed, especially for people who travel to the Granite State to buy their smokes.

A special House-Senate committee agreed to the 45-cent increase Wednesday.

Rep. Robert Elliot, R-Salem, said once the proposal for hiking the cigarette tax passed the subcommittee, he went around to a half-dozen retailers in his town to let them know he would vote against it.

“This is an attempt to not do what needs to be done,” Elliot said. “I would prefer to see gambling. If gambling does not pass, I feel very confident we’re going to see a sales or income tax.”

Gov. John Lynch has said he will reject a sales or income tax.

Elliot, a member of the House Finance Committee, said he also worries about how local convenience stores and mom-and-pop businesses could be affected by a higher tax.

The state line is dotted with convenience stores, including ones that cater specifically to cigarette smokers who travel from Massachusetts to dodge the Bay State’s levy of $2.51 per pack.

Joe Macaro, manager at Cigarette City on Route 28 in Salem, said he has seen firsthand how customers have changed their smoking habits since the New Hampshire tax increased by 25 cents a pack last year. Smokers were already reeling from a 62-cent-per-pack federal tax increase April 1, which increased the federal cigarette tax to $1.01 per pack. Some people are buying fewer cartons, or they’re buying uncut tobacco and rolling their own cigarettes.

“It’s ridiculous,” Macaro said. “Tax something else. They should just tax everyone’s grocery bill instead. I don’t smoke, so it doesn’t affect me personally. But it does affect my job somewhat.”

Steven Neely of Methuen, Mass., was buying tobacco at Cigarette City yesterday. He said he began rolling his own cigarettes months ago because cartons became too expensive for him.

He said he smokes up to 15 cigarettes a day. A pre-rolled cigarette would only give him seven to eight puffs, compared to the hand-rolled ones he can smoke for 20 minutes. A shoebox-sized bag of tobacco can last him two and a half weeks, he said.

Neely chalks up the repeated cigarette hikes to Democratic administrations on the state and federal level.

“Let me put it this way,” he said. “Between Deval (Patrick) and Obama, they both said they wanted change. But we didn’t know the only change they wanted was out of our pockets.”

New Hampshire may not find out until Wednesday — when the state budget is voted on — whether the cigarette tax increase passes.

Rep. Anthony DiFruscia, R-Windham, said he wouldn’t be surprised if the tax is lowered before it passes. The House previously backed a 35-cent-a-pack increase.

Asked if he supports the increase, DiFruscia said, “No, no, no, no, no, no. To me, it’s counterproductive in a session like this. I don’t believe that’s a way to go and I’m not going to support any tax.”

DiFruscia, like many of his counterparts in and around Salem, said he believes gambling is the one sure way to shore up the budget and avoid any new taxes. Whether the Legislature will seriously consider the latest expanded gambling proposal remains to be seen.

For Sarah Collins, a Hanover, Mass., resident who works in Lawrence, increasing the cigarette tax is offensive.

“It’s absolutely terrible,” she said. “They are already keeping us 500 feet from buildings. We are neglected citizens. If it’s that bad for us, then stop making them.”

Collins said the price increase would make the cost of her weekly trip to a Salem store nearly the same as buying them in Massachusetts.

“If there’s a 45-cent increase, then that’s going to bring the prices to the same as what it is in my neighborhood,” she said.
Copyright © 2009 Eagletribune

Idaho town to ban all public smoking

The Eagle City Council approved a ban on smoking in public places. The new ordinance includes restaurants, bars and workplaces.

This new ordinance makes Eagle the first city in Idaho to ban smoking, and goes beyond state law which does not ban smoking in bars.

During Tuesday night’s meeting many opinions were shared, but in the end it was passed.

The vote for the ban was three to two in favor… Eagle mayor Phil Bandy cast the deciding vote.

“My position is that any that a perspective employee of any place of work shouldn’t have to worry about whether or not they’re going to go into a place and be subjected to direct or second hand smoke,” Bandy said. “That shouldn’t even come into the equation.”

“I’m appalled,” said Brad Cozzens who spoke out against the ban. “I’m a non-smoker and this is about personal freedom. It’s an infringement thereof. I fell that it’s nothing more than a revenue grab.”

“I’m pleased that Eagle is taking a front line stand in terms of setting an example that may go to the other communities and possibly go the state,” John Walker said. “I’m happy for my children and happy with the city and I’m proud of the council.”

It’s unclear when this ordinance will take effect.

Violators will receive a written warning for the first offense. The fine is $25 for the second offense, and $50 for the third.

Business owners or managers who don’t abide by the smoking ban may be fined up to $100 for the first offense, $200 for the second, and $500 for the third.

In some cases, the city may revoke or suspend a business license.

Black market smokes seized

Nearly two million black market cigarettes were seized in eastern Manitoba on Wednesday in what is believed to be the largest individual bust of its kind in the province.

Investigators said they don’t know the transporter’s final destination, but he was stopped on the Trans-Canada Highway near West Hawk Lake, not far from the Manitoba-Ontario boundary.

“We don’t see a lot in this size,” said David Couprie, manager of Manitoba Finance’s special investigations unit, while showing off the haul.

The contraband cigarettes Couprie’s team seizes don’t have Manitoba or Canada tax markings and are sold underground in bars, coffee shops, bingo halls or wherever people gather, meaning no government collects taxes on them.

They’re readily available in Winnipeg, he said.

“We’re definitely seeing more (of them) and making seizures on a regular basis,” Couprie said.

In this latest bust, investigators seized 175 cases — 25 of “dis COUNT” brand cigarettes made by Jacobs Tobacco Co. in Akwesasne Mohawk Territory in New York and 150 of smokes in clear plastic bags — marked with health warnings from the U.S. Surgeon General.

That amounts to 1.75 million cigarettes in 8,750 cartons and a total street value of $395,000, Couprie said.

Sales would have resulted in $323,750 in lost taxes to the province, he said.

Falcon Beach RCMP found the smokes when they stopped a westbound rental truck during a traffic stop as part of Canada Road Safety Week. Manitoba Finance investigators were called in to enforce provincial violations.

Akwesasne straddles the boundaries of Ontario, Quebec and New York and is a primary smuggling route.

In Winnipeg, baggies containing 200 cigarettes sell for about $50, up from the $30 street price a year ago. Legal retailers sell cartons for about $90 apiece.

The driver of the truck, a 45-year-old man from St. Constant, Que., faces charges under the federal Excise Act and the Manitoba Tobacco Tax Act.

If convicted, he faces fines of up to $5,000, up to three months of jail time and a possible tax penalty of $971,250.

Copyright © 2009 Winnipegsun

Pretrial of suit vs cigarette firm called off

The pretrial of a landmark damage suit against Philip Morris Phils. Manufacturing Inc. (PMPMI) was suspended yesterday after the firm’s lawyer filed a motion to dismiss the case.

In a supplemental motion for reconsideration ad cautelam, lawyer E.M. Lombos argued that the case against PMPMI lost its legal personality when the plaintiff, Vincent Reyes, died on Dec. 1, 2004, barely six months after he filed the P500,000 damage suit.

In filing the motion, Lombos asked Judge Winlove Dumayas of the Makati regional trial court Branch 59 to overturn his ruling which allowed Reyes’ kin to take his place as plaintiff.

“If the plaintiff’s demise is proved, his alleged personal causes of action have not survived him and there is no basis for the parties claiming to be his heirs to be substituted in his stead,” he said in a five-page motion.

A confessed heavy smoker, Reyes, the younger brother of “running priest” Fr. Robert Reyes, was only 47 when he died of lung cancer.

Lombos then asked the court to reset the pretrial hearing to a later date, saying he would be attending an important meeting abroad.

Father Reyes, meanwhile, said Lombos was “obviously delaying” the hearing of the case.

The priest, who is now based in Hong Kong, was accompanied by his parents. He earlier said he was determined to attend the hearings even though it meant flying in from Hong Kong every time.

The complainant’s lawyer, Carlo Ybañez, said they were confident that Dumayas would deny PMPMI’s motion.

“There’s already jurisprudence that the heirs are valid substitutes for plaintiffs who die [while the case is being tried by the court],” he said.

After hearing the arguments of both parties, Dumayas gave Ybañez 10 days to file an answer to PMPMI’s motion.

The judge also gave Lombos 15 days to submit his reply to Ybañez’s answer.

The formal trial of the case was postponed several times after the tobacco firm asked the Court of Appeals to stop the lower court from hearing the lawsuit. Last month, the appellate court junked PMPMI’s motion.

Source: Newsinfo.inquirer

Landlords lead push to ban smoking at home

When apartment dwellers in Belmont, Calif., complained about cigarette fumes from down the hall, the City Council sprang into action on their behalf, outlawing smoking in apartments and condos and threatening to ticket violators.

When tobacco-control activists in Massachusetts embraced the same cause, they made a tactical decision that seemed surprisingly meek in a state long recognized for its prohibitions against harmful habits: They rejected the idea of governmental regulation.

It was one thing, they figured, for lawmakers to banish smoking from restaurants and bars. It was something else entirely to deploy city or state laws to prevent apartment tenants and condo owners from smoking in their own homes.

So, instead, they are leaving it to market forces, convinced that the supply side – landlords – will listen to the demand side – nonsmoking tenants – and adopt smoke-free rules.

It appears to be working.

“Now renting! Smoke-free apartment living” trumpets a banner billowing from a blocklong apartment house rising in the shadow of TD Banknorth Garden. And a soon-to-be-released survey from Northeastern University shows broad support for smoke-free living among tenants, a finding that activists plan to share in coming months with landlords, tenants, and condo boards.

“This isn’t government shoving it down the tenants’ throat,” said Jim Bergman, who directs the Smoke-Free Environments Law Project, which tracks the movement nationally. “When you start putting restrictions on where people can smoke in their home, even if it’s a rental home, they might feel that’s an infringement of their rights in a greater way than having smoke-free workplaces.”

Still, even this more gentle strategy is sure to rankle some smokers, who complain of being branded as pariahs.

Stephen Helfer, who has fought on behalf of smokers’ rights for years, said there is nothing subtle about efforts that he argues will further marginalize the poor and the mentally ill, who smoke at rates higher than the state average.

“I think they’re trying to almost blackmail landlords into doing this,” said Helfer, who lives in a Cambridge condo where smoking is allowed. “The reason they are not trying to regulate it is because they feel they don’t have the political will right now. But make no mistake: They’re going after us in our homes.”

In many respects, the home represents the final frontier of tobacco control.

Two decades ago, airlines and hospitals stood at the vanguard of campaigns to reduce smoking. Eventually, cigarettes, cigars, and pipes vanished from most offices, too. And, then, lawmakers on the West Coast, in the Northeast, and even in some tobacco-growing states, prohibited tobacco use in bars and restaurants.

That left the home as the last indoor refuge for tobacco users in states such as Massachusetts and California. It also made the home the next logical target for tobacco-control advocates.

And the reasons for wanting to bar smoking in apartments and condos are strikingly similar to those advanced in earlier campaigns for tobacco bans.

“People say, ‘I’m not being exposed to smoke at work anymore,’ and then they come home and they’re exposed all night from someone else at the opposite end of the building, and they have no way to escape it,” said Christopher Banthin, an attorney working with Northeastern’s Public Health Advocacy Institute.

In the California city, apartment tenants complained of smoke drifting under doors and cascading from air vents, triggering asthma attacks. An octogenarian who led the drive in the San Francisco suburb said there was no escape from his neighbors’ habit.

And those claims were bolstered by a 2006 report from the US surgeon general that concluded that even passing exposure to someone else’s cigarette smoke can prove perilous.

“People have criticized us and said this is a nanny state issue,” said former Belmont City Council member David Warden, who championed the regulation, which can result in a $100 fine for scofflaw smokers. “A nanny state to me is when you have laws that try to protect you from yourself.

“The intent here is to protect people from other people’s behavior.”

Last summer, Banthin’s institute conducted a telephone survey of more than 1,300 apartment and condo residents in 11 Massachusetts cities and towns, including Brookline, Cambridge, Somerville, and the Jamaica Plain section of Boston.

The survey, underwritten by the state Department of Public Health, found that three-fourths of residents whose buildings were not smoke-free either supported immediate implementation of a ban or were neutral. And 43 percent were willing to pay more to live in such a building.

Landlords, in a less scientifically reliable mail-in survey, also demonstrated enthusiasm for smoking bans – in no small part because landlords insist it can cost thousands of dollars to restore carpets and paint in units occupied by smokers. And condo boards that go smoke-free cite a lower fire risk and, potentially, reduced insurance costs.

The Mount Vernon Co., which owns apartment buildings on such tony corridors as Commonwealth Avenue and Newbury Street, was among the first to ban smoking. The policy, said Bruce A. Percelay, company chairman, reflects his own distaste for smoking and the economic benefits of going smoke-free.

“The question you may raise then is, why don’t more landlords do this?” Percelay said. “I believe that a lot of people think it’s illegal, but smokers are not a protected class. You cannot discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, or national origin, but they didn’t include smokers in that.”

In fact, Banthin said courts have repeatedly affirmed the right of landlords and condo boards to prevent smoking anywhere in their buildings.

In Chelsea, the owners of Parkside Commons Apartment Homes tout the virtues of smoke-free living right next to other amenities listed on a website. In Boston, Archstone Avenir’s 241 smoke-free apartments won’t be ready for occupancy until the summer, but already, the sprawling building across from TD Banknorth Garden is generating unusually strong demand.

“This far out from occupancy, it’s rare to have any leases, and we have 20,” said Sally Matheu, an Archstone group vice president.

Bruce Winterton has lived in one of Mount Vernon’s buildings for three years. He moved from New York, where the smoke of downstairs neighbors wafted up during the summer.

Winterton said the smoke-free status of his Back Bay apartment – along with other amenities – made him more amenable to paying a loftier rent than he had expected. Still, he said, it’s one thing for a landlord to impose a ban. But a government prohibition?

“It seems odd to me to have some significant, formal regulation that prevents you from doing something in your house,” Winterton said. “I think it becomes a slippery slope.”

Source: Boston

Boy, 10, buys cigarettes after vending machine camera identifies him as adult

A 10-year-old boy in Kyoto was able to purchase cigarettes from a vending machine equipped with face identification technology, it has been found.

Kyoto Prefectural Police conducted an experiment with the cooperation of the boy, who had bought cigarettes from a vending machine this February. Neither the Ministry of Finance, which had approved the use of such machines in lieu of those that read Taspo I.C. cards stored with personal identification information, nor the manufacturer of face identification vending machines have heard of other instances in which elementary school children have been misidentified as adults.

According to police, the boy confessed that he had purchased cigarettes from a vending machine when he was questioned by his father about the cigarettes he had in his possession, and the father then contacted the juvenile division of Kyoto police. Early this month, police asked the boy to re-enact what he had done at the vending machine in question. The boy stood on the frame of his bicycle to move closer to the camera installed in the machine, pressed the “confirm” button, and was identified as an adult.

Face identification vending machines determine a person’s approximate age from the size of their eyes and mouth and their bone structure. If a buyer is not identified as an adult, they must present a driver’s license. Designed to prevent minors from buying cigarettes, 5,200 such vending machines have been in operation across Japan since the system’s use was approved in July.

Kyoto police know of at least five instances in which junior high school students were misidentified as adults. “We plan to push the Ministry of Finance and vending machine manufacturers to make efforts to prevent minors from buying cigarettes from vending machines,” said police.

“We are currently investigating the cause,” said a representative of the vending machine manufacturer. “We are constantly upgrading our software to meet increasingly tough standards. The vending machine in question has also been upgraded.” It is unclear, however, whether the boy was able to make purchases after the upgrade.

The legal smoking age in Japan is 20.

Buying Cigarettes for the Dogs

It’s this goddamn star system. No, I’m not referring to the machinery that turns out tomorrow’s Dancing With the Stars contestants, but rather about the series of symbols that accompanies my reviews and which makes me occasionally feel like an Iron Chef judge. The star system works well for Michelin guides and tire-kicking consumer advisors, but not so well for books. Books don’t harbour immediate dangers like explosive gas tanks or E. coli — so what do stars mean in a literary context?

We all know what one- and two-star reviews indicate. Five-star reviews are a death sentence. It’s like being called a genius in print, or sleeping with a fan. A four-star rating seems to be the sweet spot: something you should make an effort to read, no matter your taste, as it could be so exquisitely crafted that it’s art, or so insurgent in its energy and originality that it’s worth getting pissed off about.

But a three-star rating, which is what I’ve labelled Stuart Ross’ new collection of short fiction, is where we encounter problems. Most authors would cringe at receiving it, thinking I mean it as an analogue to film criticism’s passive-dismissive designation of a film as a “renter.” By my measurements, however, a three-star work should be one of amazing consistency — a sure bet, rather than an overarching longshot. Flip through Buying Cigarettes for the Dog and stop on any page and it’s “Stuart Ross.” His voice is perfectly developed and that voice is “Stuart Ross.” The humour is deadpan and 100 per cent “Stuart Ross.” This author publishes a book a year and none of them has ever sucked. That’s Stuart Ross.

While there aren’t many surprises in this new book, there’s joy to spare. “Shooting the Poodle” puts an absurdist spin on noir: “Fog shuffles slowly along and light rain splashes the streets like Tabasco sauce. The windows of all the houses are dark, except one. Except one orange rectangle in the dawn. Inside a man stands in his living room, clutching a revolver at the end of outstretched arms. ‘You fucking poodle — you’re nothing but a fucking sneaky poodle,’ he says.”

Poodles, and all other small creatures beware, as Ross is the great white of the small press. His evolution has been so flawless and consistent that there’s no need for him ever not to be himself.

Source: Eyeweekly

Show is a look back at heyday of local tobacco

An old tobacco carton can be a valuable thing.

Wayne Biby of Winston-Salem was trying to sell one for $500 at yesterday’s Piedmont Tobacco Memorabilia and Postcard Show and Sale in the Home and Garden building at the Dixie Classic Fairgrounds.

The carton once contained a cigarette brand called Reyno, one of the first cigarettes made by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Biby’s former employer.

Thousands of other items could be purchased at the annual show. It was sponsored by the Piedmont Tobacco Memorabilia Collectors Club, which meets in High Point. About 400 people attended the show, organizers said. The items included a Camel mirror, a Wake Forest University lighter, an old postcard featuring the Reynolds Building at night, receipts, rolling papers, pocket tins, plug cutters, and tobacco grinders, tags and pouches.

“It’s a connection to their past,” Biby, a dealer, said about why people collect tobacco memorabilia. “It brings back stories that they heard their parents and grandparents talking about.”

One story in circulation yesterday was about the use of tin tags on plugged tobacco from about 1870 to 1930. According to the story, a drunk tobacco-chewer forgot about the tag one day and ended up with the inside of his mouth cut up.

Dan Locklair, a composer who teaches at Wake Forest University, attended yesterday’s show. He has a passion for pipes and pipe tobacco.

“I needed a break from work,” he said. “I’m fascinated by Reynolds memorabilia. I’m fascinated by all the history of tobacco and always have been.”

The Piedmont Tobacco Memorabilia and Postcard Show and Sale takes place every March. A few years ago, postcards, including many unrelated to tobacco, began to be included in the mix of wares sold as well.

“Postcards and tobacco memorabilia sort of go together,” Biby said. “There are a lot of postcards that advertise warehouses and tobacco.”

About 25 dealers set up shop at the show yesterday, with some earning several thousand dollars, Biby said.

Though most customers kept moving from table to table, a few sat on a sofa in one corner of the building and watched videos of cigarette commercials from the 1950s and ’60s. A ban on such advertising started in 1971.

Providing a venue to buy and sell the memorabilia wasn’t the only reason for sponsoring the show, organizers said.

“We’re trying to preserve the history (of tobacco),” said Michael Wagoner, the club’s president.

Wagoner, 31, of Rural Hall, also sold some of the tobacco memorabilia he began collecting about 25 years ago. He said that the club is not trying to promote smoking.

Near the building’s entrance, a mini-exhibition of tools, photos and documents showed how the making and sale of tobacco have changed over the years.

“We do this as an educational thing, too,” Biby said. “A lot of young folks know nothing about tobacco.”

Source: 2.journalnow

Claims of cigarettes use of young children into Ireland

Anti-smoking groups have expressed outrage at the cigarettes use of young children into Ireland.

Irish Heart Foundation said they believed the Government appeared to act against child abuse and the illicit trade .

This groups were responding to last night’s Prime Time which highlighted the use of young children in the importation and sale of illegal cigarettes into Ireland.

Advertisement John McCormack of the Irish Cancer Society said he believed Minister for Finance Brian Lenihan had ruled out an increase in tobacco prices in the forthcoming supplementary Budget, even though it would yield around €420m without any significant impact on inflation. Mr

McCormack said the minister, in a letter to anti-tobacco groups, cited the excuse of smuggling as a reason not to increase the tobacco tax. Mr McCormack said this was despite compelling evidence to show that such an increase would deter young people from starting and, indeed, encourage smokers to quit.

Ourcigarettes.net Lauds the Benefits of Humidors

Cigars are perishable products, and if not stored properly, cigars will dry out, become brittle, and lose their ability to provide exquisite smoking pleasure. To keep cigars at their peak freshness and flavor, they must be stored in a humidor, says Ourcigarettes.net, a leading online distributor of brand name, premium cigars from around the world.

When smoking cigars that are improperly stored, some of the following problems can occur: uneven or too rapid burn, harsh or bitter taste, broken wrapper, difficulty lighting or keeping the cigar lit, mold, or tiny holes in the cigar.
“Proper cigar storage is crucial,” said David Cagan, general manager of Ourcigarettes.net. “You wouldn’t leave your hard earned money lying around, or leave your car unlocked in a bad neighborhood. You protect the things you value, so why would you leave your cigars lying on your desk?”
Cigars shouldn’t be stored in the original cigar box because they require a critical element: proper humidity. In order to properly store a cigar, a fine balance must be maintained between the humidity and temperature at which they are stored. It is commonly agreed that 70% humidity and 70 degrees Fahrenheit is the best environment for long-term consistency.
All humidors require three essential components for maintaining humidity: a humidification unit attached to the inner lid of the humidor that includes housing; a substance to hold the moisture; and a hygrometer which allows you to check the humidity level of your humidor at a glance.
Humidors should also have durable hinges to ensure low-friction functioning for many years, and be well sealed and close tightly so that very little humidity may escape from the humidor. The basic construction of the humidor should ensure that high humidity inside the humidor will not result in deformations of the humidor case or lid and that the humidors will still close neatly after years of usage.
When using a humidor for the first time, it’s important to allow it time to “season.” This could take anywhere from a few days to a week or more depending on the size of the humidor. With brand new humidors it is helpful to use a sponge saturated in distilled water and “bathe” the inside walls of the humidor, followed up with a dry wipe to remove any water drops. Check the humidifier and hygrometer in the humidor until the humidity level reaches between 65-70%.
Ourcigarettes.net carries, sells, and promotes all major brands of premium cigars, from the world’s bestselling brands to hard-to-find boutique lines. High volume sales, fast turnover rates, and longstanding relationships with cigar manufacturers around the world enable Ourcigarettes.net to offer one of the most extensive collections of premium cigars at discounted prices, making it the premier online destination for cigar aficionados and beginning smokers alike.