June 2012 - CigarettesReviews.com | CigarettesReviews.com

Monthly Archives: June 2012

Cigars can find the release

A pair of bills in Congress may include language that would allow manufacturers of premium cigars claim they are exempt from the regulation of FDA. The bills, introduced by Congressman Bill Posey, R-Rockledge, and Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., Only exempt from the regulation of premium cigars FDA. In 2009, Congress gave the FDA authority to regulate all tobacco products. FDA intends to exercise its authority not only on cigarettes but also other products.

FDA is working on proposed rules for other categories of tobacco, said FDA spokeswoman Jenny Haliski. She declined to comment on the specifics of the situation when the power will be released and whether the tobacco premium will be included. If the FDA regulates cigars as cigarettes, they may include higher taxes and more stringent labeling requirements.

Proponents say the account premium cigar is not like other tobacco products – they are heavier, higher quality, more expensive brands that adult smoking from time to time, for fun or to celebrate a special occasion. House version has more than 200 authors, while the Senate bill is supported by at least 10 senators. But opponents say the companies that make cheaper cigars and market children can easily manipulate their products to qualify. The bills define premium cigars, as “any roll of tobacco wrapped in leaf tobacco, contains no filter, and weighing not less than 6 pounds per 1000 count.”

Many cheap cigars, cigarillos, flavored Swisher as a colorful package that can appeal to teenagers, do not have a filter and found a lot of requirements. Premium cigars are wrapped in a whole leaf tobacco. While cheaper, machine manufacture of cigars, wrapped in paper, which is often made of reconstituted tobacco sheet. Since the bill does not say “all the leaves of tobacco,” Anti-tobacco activists claim that the companies manufacturing cigars, wrapped in paper that is made from tobacco can claim exemption.

Anyone familiar with cigars, however, knows that “tobacco leaf” means the same thing as the whole leaf tobacco, said John Sullivan, manager of JR Cigar store in Washington, DC Posey said he sees no need to clarify the wording. “I think (formulation), adequate,” said Posey. “You should not use cannon to kill a sparrow.” In addition, the imprecise wording, the producers can modify their products so that they are wrapped in whole-leaf tobacco, said Joe Augustus, senior vice president for external relations in Swisher, Florida cigar manufacturer who manufactures Swisher Sweets one of the flavored products, which anti-smoking activists say are sold to children.

It would be expensive to change the shell, but it would probably be cheaper than the observance of the rules of FDA, said in August. Both of the bill in committee, with plenty of obstacles before they can pass a law. Furthermore, if the FDA, a part of the executive branch, firmly on the regulation of cigars, it is unlikely that the president will sign the bill, providing the opposite. There is another way to free premium cigars, although lawmakers could use the power of the purse to prevent the FDA from spending money to adjusted premium cigars in the bill relates.

Fiscal 2013 appropriations bill, agriculture, which will be considered by the House Environment, includes a provision FDA. Limiting expenses is a legal and easy way for the legislative branch to test the strength of the executive branch, said Patrick Griffin, Academic Director of Public Relations and Propaganda Institute at the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University. Matt Myers, President Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said that “it would be a flagrant abuse of the process of appropriation to the presence of free cigars they had no hearings, no public debate, not an opportunity to review the language in the relevant house committee.”

August said Swisher is not in favor of regulation, but is opposed to such an exemption because it is to make the playing field uneven – some products will be regulated, while others will claim exemption, as well as companies that produce machinery of domestic production will have to pay a large part of the user fees. Premium cigar industry includes about 86,000 people and sells 200 million to 250 million cigars a year, said Bill Spann, Director General of the International Premium Cigar and Pipe Association of retailers. This is a tiny fraction of 7000000000 for the mass market cigars sold annually.

Why I voted against the tax on tobacco

A few weeks ago, California voters narrowly rejected another tax increase, not only on cigarettes but also on those mass murderers – cigar and pipe smokers. As expected, supporters of Proposition 29 blamed his defeat on all of the money tobacco companies spend on advertising against the proposal. Whenever a candidate supports the progressive vote is defeated, the loss associated with money. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is not recalled? This is also due to money, but not widely taxpayer disgust with public employee unions helped bankrupt states (eg California).

On the other hand, in 2008, when then-Sen. Barack Obama became the first major party candidate to refuse public financing of campaigns and raised more than $ 740 million in private money, outspending Republican John McCain’s nearly 4-in-1, or progressive complained that Obama’s victory was due to the money. Also, it should be noted, did the Conservatives. Those who complain about the tobacco companies spend on the proposal 29 also ignore the many hundreds of millions of dollars in anti-tobacco ads spent in California, as well as anti-smoking organizations in recent decades. Not to mention the tobacco control message drummed into young people from first grade through high school.

It is the voters of California have seen a total of 29 advertisements against the proposal and voted against the proposal for many reasons. I suspect that the majority of Californians who voted against the motion – the vast majority of whom, like me, do not smoke cigarettes, you know how unhealthy they are, and pushes them to smell – did it for the same reasons. (Full disclosure: I smoked cigars and pipes since I was a teenager, my father, 93 years, smoking cigars almost every day for 70 years, and my sons and I are some of our most wonderful father-son talks. On cigars ) Many of us deny that people – especially the poor, who constitute the bulk of smokers – should have their hard earned money taken from them at astronomical rates just because they participate in what is a potentially lethal activity.

This will allow the anti-smoking zealots to stun, but the choice between avoiding risks to health and taking away individual freedom, many Americans have really come down on the side of freedom. In addition, to put it mildly, morally confused society, which uses state funds to pay for a completely healthy women ruin perfectly healthy human fetus / child, but takes a huge amount of money people to participate in an act that affects only them. (Readers who feel that invented statistics, 50,000 Americans die each year from passive smoking, but who prefers to promote science may wish to read, among many other studies and articles, and two that are related to the online version of this story. One of them, your doctor orders Web site, discusses the myth of passive smoking. The other National Institutes of Health report on the same topic.)

I warned 20 years ago that the war against tobacco was morally wrong. If morality was the impetus to the animation, why not a similar war against alcohol, trying to impose its existence, the prohibition of its ads, etc.? Smokers may harm him, but alcohol is often involved in cases of murder and other violent crimes, especially sexual violence, drunk drivers kill and maim tens of thousands of Americans each year, and the majority of children and spousal abuse is accompanied by alcohol. No rapes drive in vehicles filled with family or spouse abuse because they smoked cigarettes or cigars.

Too much alcohol reduces the ability of conscience to function properly. Too many cigarettes or cigars do not affect the conscience.

If any American does not drink alcohol, almost nobody in America will die or be maimed at the hands of drunk drivers, children and domestic violence will be reduced by an incredible two-thirds, killing other people will be reduced by about a third, the incidence of rape and other sexual assaults have been significantly reduced, and millions of children do not have a permanent disability who grew up with alcoholic parents. (Link to the Bureau of Justice Statistics found in the online version of this story.)

On the other hand, if no one smoked an American – or, for that matter, if all Americans are smoking – it does not have any impact on the number of Americans killed or injured by other drivers, the number of children, spouses or other relatives abused, and has no adverse effect on the psyche of children. What’s crazy is that none of these facts, the issue of anti-smoking and other health fanatics. I also warned that, after tobacco and other harmful products will be prohibited or unfair taxation. Of course, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently proposed that the city ban on serving of sugar-based soda in the cup for more than 16 ounces.

After not drinking sweetened beverages from childhood, I think that every overweight person who drinks regular soda makes a big mistake. But I would prefer to live in a nation of obese people who are free, than in thin country nationals who are not. There are now calls to ban the sale of popcorn in movie theaters. Eventually, citizens will have to bear the calories cards that limit how many people will be able to consume on any given day. When adding a virtual certainty that most of the funds from another tax will be spent by the state, was not a good or moral grounds have voted for the proposal 29.

If the tax passed many if not most, of the cigar stores in California have gone out of business? In addition to the cost of our beleaguered state jobs, which broke my heart? When I am one of my favorite places in Los Angeles, Fat Stogies Ventura Boulevard in the San Fernando Valley, I sit and schmooze with other guys – the latter an Orthodox Jew, Armenian, black, and one or both of the Arab brothers who own a shop – and thank God for America, where people from different walks of life so you can both enjoy each other. And I am grateful for my father introduced me to the joy of cigars. So, please, leave us alone. We do not harm anyone.

Area smoke shops react to hike the state tax on tobacco products

Richard Hayes works First of all alcoholic beverages on the area of Indian Oaks in Bolingbrook for 25 years and has sold thousands and thousands of packs of cigarettes from his regular customers.

This may change with the recently adopted $ 1-pack state tax which came into effect on Sunday.

“I consider the termination of the sale of cigarettes,” said Hayes. “I only sell individual packages for the convenience of their customers, so it does not really bring a lot of income for me. I would prefer people buy other products here, so I really do not feel strongly one way or another.”

Illinois legislators recently approved a tax increase, which means taxes on cigarettes is now raised to $ 1-pack, more than double the previous state cigarette tax, which amounted to 98 cents. The state currently taxes as a small cigar with the same rate as cigarettes.

Governor Pat Quinn signed into law on June 14, and the increase applies to all tobacco products, including roll your own cigarettes, chewing tobacco and pipe tobacco.

Legislature hoped that raising taxes will result in $ 350 million. This plan is part of Quinn and the efforts of legislators to come up with $ 2.7 billion due to reduction and new revenue sources to fight the state for Medicaid. The measure also allows Illinois to get another $ 350 million federal match of the government to pay for taxpayer-subsidized health care for the poor.

Pankag Shah, manager of the tobacco outlet 675 N. Cass Street. Westmont, believes that most customers are aware of the tax, and because of this, they “supplied” for the last week or so.

“It may take two to three weeks before we really begin to see the impact, because customers bought before the new tax,” said Shah. “We will take a hit, but not to these people to escape from the fact that they bought before the tax.”

Shah believes that the long term it will have an impact on business, as many people will go to Indiana or other states to purchase large quantities of tobacco products in order to avoid taxes, he said.

While the Shah was aware of the tax, a smoker was caught off guard.

Heather Barnes, a customer outside the Westmont tobacco, 840 E. Ogden Ave., Said Monday she did not know about the tax increase, until she went to buy cigarettes.

“I heard there will be a new tax, but was not sure when it started,” said Barnes. “It’s funny, all these taxes.”

But she said she could give her a reason to cut back on smoking in an attempt to save money, and may even try to quit smoking.

“I tried to leave early; I now have another reason to do so. It costs too much,” says Barnes.

Danny McGoldrick, vice president for research of the national campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said that his organization reviews of raising taxes after they take effect, and the figures show that less tobacco is bought, the more income is included in, where each State uses different ways based on their financial needs.

“We looked at more than 100 tax increase, and every State sees decline in sales of tobacco consumption and raise revenue,” he said.

McGoldrick acknowledged that some reduction in the number of packages sold in states that have significantly increased their taxes was due to interstate smuggling and from smokers will be lower other taxes of the state to buy cigarettes, but noted that the decrease in consumption of more smokers to quit smoking and cut.

If the smoker goes local in Indiana, they can expect to pay between $ 5.50 and $ 6 per pack, depending on the package in the store, while in Wisconsin, it will cost $ 8 after tax. Cook County may be known for its higher prices, but do not bet on Chicago, where a pack of smokes will cost between $ 11 and $ 13 from $ 8 to $ 10 in the near western suburbs.

Current tax, local and state, a pack of cigarettes in the city of Chicago is $ 3.66. Illinois became the 32nd as the highest among the states and the District of Columbia from the taxes on cigarettes.

With the new tax, the state will evaluate as the 16th highest in the country. Neighboring Missouri has the lowest tobacco tax in the country, at 17 cents per pack. However, the situation may change as the Missouri put 73 percent tax increase on the ballot for next year.

Income tax is estimated to only part of the benefit of the tax, McGoldrick said. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids estimates that the tax will prevent 70,000 Illinois children from smoking, as well as to Illinois 50 000 adults quit the habit.

“Not to mention it will reduce the long-term health care by $ 2 billion,” said McGoldrick.

Tobacco tax disputes stopped hearing

Residents who opposed the changes in legislation; tax revenues in the three rural counties in Alabama can breathe a sigh of relief after the bill was declared unconstitutional in court on Friday.

After months of fierce resistance from residents of Randolph, Clay and House district, Senate bill 476, 486 and 487 will not enter into force on 1 July. The bills would be sent to tobacco tax money collected in the countries with the three members of the grant fund controlled by legislators.

“After meeting with the Attorney General, he convinced us we should have been re-advertised the bill, and that it was unconstitutional,” said Sen. Gerald Dial, R-Lineville, one of the three bills’ sponsors. “We’re not going to support some general rules Attorney unconstitutional.”

Meeting set and the Attorney General came in response to a lawsuit filed in Clay County against the recruitment, Rep. Richard Laird, R-Roanoke, and Rep. Duwayne Bridges, R-Valley – sponsors of the bill. Similar complaints were filed in Randolph and Chambers of Commerce.

Attempts to reach the office of the Attorney General on Monday were unsuccessful.

The accounts have attracted a storm of opposition in the rural districts after the first appearance in the local newspapers earlier this year. The efforts of the bipartisan organization of county officials have led to public hearings in the House of Montgomery in May, where the opposition attacked the creation of a “slush fund” created by the bill. The group also questioned the motives of the legislators responsible for the bills and the arguments for getting money from the Randolph County Water Authority and the clay and the Chambers County Commission.

Dial said the problem with the legality of the accounts “were laid only in their advertising. In its original form, the bills are designed to re-route money from tobacco taxes in the creation and maintenance of the legislative district, but the final version of the bill does not mention the office. Instead, the money will be spent on establishment of a fund, a grant-controlled set, Laird, and bridges.

“Many people do not want to open an office backup,” Dial said. “So we’re done with that, of the bill, and this is the part that made it unconstitutional.”

The position of attorney general is the same as Governor Robert Bentley took last month when he vetoed the bill. Lawmakers voted to override Governor’s veto.

Greg Warner, a lawyer representing Ashland Clay County Commission in the lawsuit, said the decision of the Attorney General “comfort”, but said he has other problems with the accounts, in addition to its advertising.

“There are still problems with the bill not only procedural,” said Warner. “We hope that the judge will decide that the essence of the bill is also unconstitutional.”

In particular, Warner said: “The creation of a” slush fund “that pools the money to be used at the discretion of the account” bills sponsors are not only unethical – as he and other residents retained after the introduction of bills – but also illegal.

“The law is quite clear that the Legislature can not create a committee of its members and the taxpayers’ money to fund it and give yourself the freedom of,” said Warner. “It should have some control and participation of the executive power.”

Warner said another potential blow to the bill may come with the adoption of the last lines of the Senate District, Clay County cut in half. Western Pacific Region, including the majority of Ashland, County will no longer be part of a set of Senate District, while residents of the district continues to pay the tax on tobacco products contribute to the fund is only available for the area.

“Half of Clay County continues to pay for other areas,” said Warner. “I think it is completely unconstitutional.”

If the judge does not rule out the contents of the bills as unconstitutional, they can be re-advertised and are logged in as the new bills in the next legislative session.

“We have not met to discuss that yet, but I’m sure we will,” said Monday Laird. “I can tell you, we can not change any advertising in next time for sure.”

Laird was the only one of three lawmakers to appear at the hearing on Friday in Clay County, but does not say. He said that the decision not to protect the accounts were based on current funding requirements for organizations such as volunteer fire departments and animal shelters in the country contributed to the tobacco tax money.

“The only possible action the judge would have been to put everything on hold,« Laird said. “All of these agencies that receive money will go without funding but it took several months to decide.”

With new accounts amazed taxes on tobacco products will continue to work within existing laws, that is money that should have been taken out of the water body and the Randolph County and Clay County Commission Chambers will be restored.

CCBC part of a larger trend of tobacco ban in schools

The Community College of Baltimore County is planning to put out the tobacco on campus from July 1, continuing a trend already found in many other schools in the district of Baltimore.

Once the policy becomes effective, the school will allow the use of tobacco products only in private vehicles in college parking lot outside the roadway, or on the perimeter within designated stalls are located along the roadway.

Tobacco users are located outside these areas in Catonsville, Dundalk and Essex campuses during the first six months of the ban will receive oral and written warnings, said Hope Davis, a spokesman for the school.

After January 1, violation will result in $ 35 citations, she said.

“We believe that this is what’s really good for college,” Davis said. “We hope to move towards smoking and make a better environment for all.”

Until July 1, tobacco has been limited for at least 25 meters from the buildings of schools, Davis said.

The new policy does not affect the satellite sites in schools Hunt Valley, Owings Mills, Randallstown, or Ridge Road, where 25-foot minimum on the spot.

The college, which has more than 70,000 students, offering cessation classes fall on each of the campuses of the school, Davis said.

The school cooperates with the Baltimore County Department of Health to ensure that teachers and staff to participate in these classes, even if it occurs during their work, Davis said.

When asked to respond to the new policy, Davis said that it is difficult to assess before the policy goes into affect.

“I have not heard a lot of negativity about politics yet,” Davis said. “But I did not know he hit man. We probably know a little more after July 1, and students will return in full force in the autumn.”

Vivienne Stearns, Elliott, a spokesman for the Maryland Chapter of the American Cancer Society, called the ban of tobacco products at school, “probably, the trend” among colleges and universities in this area.

She used the Towson University as an example of a college that banned the use of tobacco products on campus. Towson opened its ban in August 2010, prohibits smoking in all buildings and all external grounds owned or run by universities.

“This is an encouraging sign each time a different campus decides to do it”, Stearns, said Elliott. “This is a trend, and you’ll often hear about the ban.”

Stearns, Elliott said that the American Cancer Society does not keep statistics on the number of institutions that prohibit the use of tobacco.

The use of tobacco and tobacco smoke contributes a third of all cancer cases, she said.

Of the 160,000 deaths from lung cancer each year in the United States, Stearns, said Elliott 3400 non-smoking adults die of the disease due to passive smoking.

In 2008, theUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, adopted policies to prevent smoking within 20 feet of all building openings, including doorways, windows and ventilation systems of consumption.

Elyse Ashburn, spokesman for UMBC, said that smoking is also prohibited on the patio outside the community and at school, “Main Street” area, which extends from the library on the next street, which has a wellness activity.

Ashburn said that the signs indicate areas where smoking is permitted.

Claims filed on account of taxes on tobacco products

Last week, Ashland attorney, Gregory M. Varner filed suit in district court and in his home county of Clay and Randolph County on Tobacco Control, the local legislative delegation of tax bills, Claims are looking for solutions that Senate Bill 486, relating to Randolph County, and Senate Bill 476 in Clay County are unconstitutional. Being a lawsuit in Randolph County are state Sen. Gerald Dial, Rep. Richard Laird, Rep. DuWayne Bridges, Dr. Marquita Davis, Alabama Director of Finance, and Thomas L. Wright, Jr., State Comptroller.

Warner filed a number of five actions on behalf of Randolph County Industrial Development Board, Randolph County water, sewer, power and fire protection, and as a person: Hutch Hammond, Faye Sims Smith and Todd Freeman. He said that there is some belief that only certain individual in the lawsuit. Freeman, Hammond and Smith are listed as Randolph County citizens and taxpayers. Davis and White sued in their official capacity. Warner contends SB 486 unconstitutional, null and void, and said the plaintiffs want the ban as a temporary and permanent, not allowing changes and changes in income distribution Randolph County taxes on tobacco.

In the end, Warner said that the costumes are designed for each of the accounts in each district set aside as unconstitutional. In addition, the counties of Clay will be taxation without representation. Citizens will pay the tax on tobacco products in the Community Service Grant Authority is currently controlled by the Dial, bridges and Laird districts, but after the entry into force of this money will be controlled by people who do not represent Clay County. After 2014 parts of the country will be represented by one senator and two other members who are not members of the body of the grant. Clay is no longer in the Laird, and much of it will not be in the face.

“That’s why we bring a suit, number one; the bills were passed in regard to the overwhelming opposition of all countries. We protect the taxpayers’ money, and in the words of the governor, the closure of the slush fund, which is unconstitutional,” said Warner. Randolph County Industrial Development Board of the plaintiff, because when the bill becomes effective July 1, it limits the powers of the Board to manage its affairs and the limits of its use of funds, according to the complaint.

This will lead to inevitable and irreparable damage to the two authorities (Water Authority and the Industrial Development Board), the cessation of expansion of the planned expansion of the water line to provide water for many rural communities and will include the termination of valuable and experienced staff to RCIDC, the complaint alleged. Water Authority says an average of $ 50,000 will be sent annually from the operating budget for this bill. The complaint says the governor, Robert Bentley veto SB 486, stating that the bill was not properly advertised as required by law in Alabama. The Senate and the House eventually overcame the veto of the executive.

Jeremy King, Deputy Director of Communications in the office of the governor, said: “Governor Bentley believes that the bill is unconstitutional, and he was very open about the fact that since the purpose of his veto. The fact that the Legislature has overcome his veto will not change their opinion on the matter. ” Warner said during a recent visit to the Governor in Clay County man in a group session, thanked the governor for his veto, the governor referred to the fund set up accounts as a slush fund and said that they are unconstitutional.

Warner asked the governor to join the suit, and he said he did not know if he could do it, but it will look like in it. Means the Industrial Development Board of the tobacco tax may, as stated in the bill, but is spent on attracting new and existing industries, and not more than 20 percent of the revenue can be spent on staff and / or related personnel. This limits the discretion of the Council for Industrial Development, which prohibits the use of funds for work on the broader economic development initiatives such as workforce development and job training, the complaint says.

Dial the complaint states have changed the proposed legislation, which is not advertised as required after the change. For example, the published notice established and funded by the Community Services District Office personnel, equipment, etc., but that was removed from the amended bill. Area Community Service Grant Authority, consisting of three members of the legislative delegation has been created to allocate funds. Furthermore, the distribution of tobacco has been changed, as well as the effective date of SB 486.

The complaint also alleged, SB 486 discriminatory, since the tax is levied in Randolph County can be used in other countries. David Meddick, chairman of the Randolph County Democratic Executive said that the group plans to meet and decide to join this lawsuit or not. House District discussed in closed session Monday, but took no action.

Clay County Commissioner Roy Johnson, and individuals, Terry Meek, Mary Wood and Andrea Jackson filed a lawsuit in Clay County against the same people, but added, Johnny McReynolds, chairman of the Alabama Forestry Commission, Clay County Industrial Development Board and the citizens for the welfare of animals in the county Clay as a defendant. Their opposition in the Senate Bill 476. The complaint also requests that the defendants be ordered to the allocation of funds in accordance with the instructions of SB 476. The legislation will divert about $ 117,000 from the operating budget Clay County Commission. SB 476 would increase the percentage of clay county income taxes on tobacco products from 32 to 35 percent will be Forestry Commission. Industrial Development Board, the amount increases according to a new bill from 20 to 25 percent. No current recipient of funds under these bills the citizens for the welfare of animals in Clay County will receive 15 percent of the income tax on tobacco.

The complaints are similar except when SB 476 takes effect from $ 68,000 annually will be sent to Clay County Commission of the General Fund and $ 48,000 will be withdrawn from the fund committee, dedicated to the water mains supply. Services may be eliminated or reduced. The planned expansion of the water line may be terminated. The complaint also said the percentage set aside for the Community Service Grant authority in all three districts: District 476 S. Clay points to 25 percent, or an average of $ 60,000 per year, Randolph County SB 486 points to 10 percent, or $ 50,000 per year, and District Chamber of SB 487 points to 18 percent, or roughly $ 90,000 per year.

The census is 13 932 Clay County, Randolph County is 22,913, and Chambers County is 34,215. Per capita, Clay County residents will pay $ 4.30, $ 2.18 Randolph residents and residents of Chambers $ 2.63. The complaint alleged, Clay County residents pay more per capita funding for the grant of authority. Dial and Laird did not immediately return phone calls Tuesday for comment on the suit. Previously, Dial said, if people want to spend their money filing a lawsuit is their business. He said the Attorney General Luther Strange will protect them.


For some, they still do. But New Zealand might be one of the first countries in the world to eliminate smoking entirely. Susan Edmunds investigates the murder of cancer of the tobacco industry.

Golnaz Bassam Tabar is observed every time the work is achieved through a cigarette. Out of its offices in central Auckland, it pops Mild Seven cigarettes between her lips glossed to restrain her perfectly straightened hair from her face and lit celebratory smoke. “Working in a high-pressure environment, it was something to look forward to. Do it, get it back and get a cigarette.” Bassam Tabar, 30, is proud that she recently kicked the habit is responsible for the weakening of her shoulders, as well as the occasional admiring glance from a stranger.

“When I was growing up, I thought it was very cool, sexy thing,” she says. “My mother used to smoke and I thought she was so gorgeous and glamorous with a cigarette when she was kicking back … it always looked so cool doing it.” But if the government gets its way, the rest of the smokers in the country will follow example Bassam Tabar and kick his ass. Nevertheless, it remains easy sexuality of smoking, a hint of danger that the men noticed.

Anyone who will admit is a smoker’s head columnist Damien Grant. He said that the cigarette between his lips gives a touch of swagger of James Dean to even the mildest of the employees. “You do not marry a smoker, it is obvious – but a dangerous relationship, of course.” Our government has declared its goal to make the country “smoking” in 2025. This is not a ban – just reduce smoking to a level at which the cigarettes are not readily available, smoking is not popular, and it’s expensive to be out of reach of most in their daily lives. Smoking rate below 5 percent would qualify.

Bhutan has already declared itself smoke-free. But we are racing countries such as Finland, to be the first in the Western world to eradicate smoking. In 2025, for example, lobbyists, it is time to prohibit the retail sale of tobacco completely. Children born today will never know that the first cigarette on the back of the school tennis courts. Researcher Murray Laugesen: “You’ve got to cut it off somewhere It’s not wise to allow the continuation of the sale of such products addictive” For those of us who remember the offices of the complete chain smoking, and the aircraft on which it was quite common to look to the altar and see line hands dangling cigarettes arms, it’s almost unbelievable.

Gone are the days when smoking was Ayn Rand-style expression of power – the holding of fire between his fingertips. Glamorous Audrey Hepburn would be forced to leave the pub nowbe if she put a treat that the mouthpiece between the lips. Converting from smoking during the past sexy secretaries waist tightened Mad Men on the scourge of society requires an organized campaign about the dangers to health regulations and prohibitions. This week, the Board of Auckland has shown that it is considering a ban on smoking in public places. Twenty-four other councils, including Rotorua, Whangarei, Far North, Bay of Plenty and Christchurch, has a policy against smoking in public places. But the biggest blow to the fagging came in 2003 when the government passed legislation to implement the ban on smoking in schools and workplaces – the days of a pint and a cigarette in a bar. In December 2004 a new generation of smokers fears the elements outside the pub, or shelter in the doorways of office buildings. Smoking
was literally thrown out into the cold.

New anti-smoking measures proposed all the time: Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia wants a ban on smoking in cars. Actions on Smoking and Health (ASH) spokesman Michael Colhoun says it’s time to introduce measures to restrict the supply and demand, such as the licensing of sellers of tobacco products. The Cabinet accepted in principle a plan to make cigarettes for sale in plain packaging. Australia will not introduce the motion pending the outcome of litigation with the tobacco giant Phillip Morris is known, probably around September.

Down the hall, the head of the Imperial Tobacco Finance Brendan Walker rails against the anti-smoking efforts of the government, saying that they are unreasonable, unnecessary and unreasonable. This is a massive violation of human business, he says. “We will take all steps we can to protect our intellectual property.” Laugesen, who has been studying smoking since the mid-1980s, said that the most effective measures are those that sting of smokers in the pocket – and the exponential growth of excise duty done New Zealand tobacco is one of the most expensive in the world. Over the years, our prices are tobacco were among the highest in the world, in relation to our income. New Zealanders are now paying more for a standard package of 20 cigarettes, smokers than the guy in the UK, South Africa, USA, Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan.

We pay about the same as the Australians are now – but quickly outstrip their prices with the Government of New Zealand are programmed annually by 10 per cent rates. Cigarettes are $ 1 each in 2016. The package price is 30 g of tobacco leaves about $ 40 for four years. The changes are expected to put an additional $ 528 million into state coffers and reduce the number of smoking-related deaths in the range from 300 to 350 a year. But that’s not enough for the Ministry of Health, which suggested that the Government consider raising the price of ciggies 20 to $ 100 in 2020. And it’s not enough to Turia, who as minister of the first Labour-led government and the current National-led government insists on anti-smoking measures – including the drivers are asked to wag their fingers at others they see smoking with kids in the car.

Turia says she wants a 50 per cent more than the price of tobacco products, effective immediately – in accordance with one embodiment of the Ministry. Colhoun Ash agrees. He said that smokers should be a large increase in shock, to induce them to leave, a 10 percent increase by no more than a minor annoyance that people will change their budgets to absorb. Laugesen is approved in the latest New Zealand Medical Journal at a price boost of 40 percent next year, and then increases each year by 20 percent. He says that the limitation is increased to 10 percent per year, will push the smoke-free goal beyond the reach New Zealand until 2040, in the near future. He hopes that the government may revise its proposal on the background of understanding of the legislation, which closed at the end of this month.

Mana Party leader Hone Harawira would like to see smoking banned immediately, but said that the government is too pragmatic to do so. “We are in severe financial constraints and it is raising $ 1 billion per year for the government, I can not see that happening.” He has a point. Tobacco is the mass worker to the government. Amount it collects in excise tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products has almost doubled over the past two decades. Smokers are now generating more funds for the government than it receives in payment of the largest state-owned enterprises, Meridian Energy. Meridian paid $ 163 million in common dividends last year. Imperial Tobacco, alone, accounts for about $ 249m in tax. Corporate Affairs Manager Cathy Edwards said 80 percent of the company’s products are the direct income to the government – and this is just one of the three tobacco companies, which dominate the market in New Zealand.

Despite the overall drop in sales, the condition of the Emperor to be on the rise. Its profit rose to $ 21 million last year, due to increased sales by 16 percent. Duty is the biggest cost of the tobacco companies at a rate of 72 percent of revenue Imperial Tobacco in its final year. In addition, the company paid $ 9.3 in tax. Even the Ministry of Finance recognizes smokers generally pay for themselves. They die on average 15 years earlier than nonsmokers, so if they have to treat unpleasant smoking-related diseases, the tax they pay for their habit of that coverage. BrendanWalker Imperial says it’s something that people need to remember. Smokers continue to smoke, says Laugesen, while the price does not allow them to continue. Eleven percent less tobacco was sold during the period between 2010 and 2011, and that is now attributed to higher prices. “You can change the warning and nothing happens, but when the price goes up, people act.”

In 1992 New Zealand had the lowest tobacco use in adults in OECD countries, which says Laugesen was achieved through taxation. And the smoking rate continues to fall. Those few who still smoke consume only 12 days on average, compared with 20 in 1980. Thus, we give enough thought those smokers who, by their own admission, the dependence of? Smokers should be offered an alternative, Laugesen admits. “Smokers need consideration of how they cope. Provision is not made for smokers to quit smoking by alternative means. “He says that the de-nicotine cigarettes should be available and should be cheaper than standard varieties. He also wants the government to lift the ban on electronic cigarettes containing nicotine. It can import nicotine cigarettes from abroad for personal use, but the government did not allow them to be sold.

“If you ask them they say that nicotine is a drug and may not be sold unless it is authorized medical license them, but most of the nicotine, recreational use and there is reason for this continues to be. In my opinion, they can be sold in accordance with the Law smoke environment. “Talk to the tobacco companies, and they say that smokers will find a way to smoke, all that the government is doing. Prevent or hike the price of cigarettes, they say, and you’ll just provide a vacuum to be filled in the black market – an illegal trade that benefits no one, and organized crime. Ernst & Young report to Parliament for the British American Tobacco says tobacco black market is not a serious problem because of our geographical position and the way our borders are under control. But Walker said that the Government of Australia said until last year when it seized 60 tons of black market tobacco. He says that more than a quarter of smokers are aware of the black market products, and come a time when the price makes them buy. “There will be a price that makes law-abiding citizens into the hands of criminals.”

Illegal tobacco can not even come across the border. Two illegal cultivation of tobacco had been found guilty in Auckland District Court this week, and Imperial Tobacco said 4.7 tones of illegally manufactured tobacco, which was captured, would have done almost seven million cigarettes. “The total fine of $ 7,500 is less than 1 percent of the profits that these people would make from selling tobacco illegally.” Most of the illegal tobacco grown in New Zealand is Motueka, and in the Far North. Ernst & Young report says illegal tobacco is about 3.3 percent of total consumption in the present, and the loss of revenue for the government of $ 40 to $ 50 million each year. It says the price is the main factor for the transition to black-market product. Health lobbyists relaxed about the possibility that, as prices increase, smokers will grow by them. The law allows the farmer’s house, to an amount equal to about 80 cigarettes a day. They expect to be reduced, but they say, growing your own is a good alternative when the government finally bites the bullet and it is to remove tobacco from shops.

David Owen, a longtime smoker who had beaten them to it. He started production of tobacco in the home, almost by accident. Owen won three tobacco plants and produced approximately 50 g of tobacco, seeds and an envelope with at least one “fucking unbelievable” cigar. He said the procedure was simple. He received much of his information from a person Waihi, Peter Joyce, who writes a blog about the growth of their own tobacco: “Here in New Zealand”, he writes: “You can buy tobacco seeds to grow things, and if you want to smoke it is legitimate. You can not legally sell it, barter it or give it away. “Joyce recommends that home manufacturers have a dozen plants, if possible.” Tobacco is largely looks after … a lot of absolute nonsense is put on over the difficulty of treating tobacco. “

This country could be smoking, says Harawira – this is the case of obligations.

He wants New Zealand stubs from the habit in 2025. “The country wants to make it happen. My hopes are very high.” Laugesen says that even the strongest wish to change the smoker. “Even the angriest smokers will give in; we do not want to go on like this. For children born today, would not be good if we had an anti-smoking New Zealand for them?” Excise tax increases … Bassam Tabar said any efforts by the Government, would have made any difference if it did not hit a long bout of bronchitis, which did hurt to smoke.

Smoking is as important to her as food. This is a pack of cigarettes was a necessity, not luxury. No matter what price she would pay for it. “It does not matter how the food gets expensive, you have to buy it,” says Bassam Tabar. “It’s the same thing. I would not be stopped.”

House panel warns the FDA from regulating the “premium cigars”

Committee of the Congress moved Tuesday to release the so-called “premium hand-rolled cigars” from oversight by the Food and Drug Administration. Exclusion, relying largely by legislators from Florida, is closely associated with cigar bodies, there will be a direct prohibition on FDA regulation of fancy cigars are sold mainly in the high-end stores of tobacco.

But there is a stern warning in the language accompanying the bill FDA spending, the House Appropriations passed Tuesday: “The Committee recalls, FDA, premium cigars that have unique characteristics and the prohibitive cost and are not sold to children Any attempt. Regulate the cigars should take these items into account. “

This language is concerned about the anti-tobacco crusaders, such as the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. They fear that tobacco companies are using loopholes to apply rules to all cigars, including those that “encompass a variety of non-premium cigar with a sweet taste, low prices and colorful packaging that appeal to young people.”

Some tobacco companies have tried to avoid paying taxes, making small changes to their products that the reclassification of their small cigars instead of cigarettes. In Florida, some stores were maneuvering around a hefty state and federal taxes on tobacco, allowing smokers roll their own cigarettes on-site machines.

“We have seen how companies can manage their products,” said Danny McGoldrick, vice president for research at Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. “Some of the products that used to be cigarettes is now a big cigar.”

Notice FDA is buried in 89 pages of the report language, the text that accompanies the legislation. He does not carry the force of law, but it is often used to communicate the wishes of Congress. Institutions that do not follow the language of the report may have to respond to the committee on why they did not.

Senate Bill Expenditures FDA has similar wording: “The Committee urges the agency to issue the draft regulations and regulations as necessary Committee requests the agency to consider, among other things, the question of characterizing flavors of cigars, in particular, as he did. Both are based in part on legislation sponsored two Florida lawmakers, Republican Congressman Bill Posey, and Sen. Bill Nelson. A spokesman for Nelson said his office has no role in the House action on Tuesday, and that they wrote the laws for premium hand-rolled cigars. Senator Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Is one of the sponsors.

House Bill Posey has the support of 203 people lawmakers from both parties, including almost all of Florida: Republican Reps. Sandy Adams, Gus Bilirakis, Vern Buchanan, Mario Diaz-Balart, Connie Mack, John Mica, Jeff Miller, Rich Nugent, David Rivera, Tom Rooney, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Dennis Ross, Steve Southerland, Allen West and Bill Young. Democratic Reps. Kathy Castor, Alcee Hastings, and Frederick Wilson are also on board.

Florida lawmakers recently moved the party line, to help defeat an amendment to the farm bill that would have stopped federal quota sugar. Nelson and Rubio supported the sugar industry of the state in this fight.

Jenny Haliski, spokesman for the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, said the agency did not comment on the bill. FDA has the right to regulate the manufacture, distribution and marketing of tobacco products in accordance with the Law on Tobacco Control, adopted in 2009 and that “the movement as soon as possible” to write rules for cigars, which will be open for public discussion, Haliski said.

George Cecala, a representative of Posey, House sponsor of the bill, dropped it, as a matter of consumer choice. Washington is too eager to create a nanny state, Cecala said, “This is an example of people in Washington who do not like the product is trying to remove the freedom of people like it.”

E-cigarettes are growing in popularity: vaping, not to smoke

Mike Mangione can think of other reasons than it is, nicotine-stained fingers do not move from conventional cigarettes to electronic alternatives.

He is one of about 2.5 million people are now inhaling nicotine through a battery-powered device that heats the liquid to vapor, which takes fire – and the resin and many other carcinogens contained in cigarettes – smoking.

At 41, he realizes breathe easier and involves inhaling scented steam to be healthier than taking the 600 ingredients in cigarettes – 4000 compounds when burned, according to the American Lung Association – including acetone, formaldehyde resins, benzene, butane, and lead. And he spends $ 30 to $ 40 per month “vaping”. He spent $ 150 per month for Marlboro.

In addition, as a man, he says that “girls do not like smoking. It’s all spoiled.”

This is doubly in his family.

 Their father, Dale, bought their first device, which cost $ 60 to $ 80, because they helped him to give up tobacco.

This means that in the ranks of 46 million smokers in the United States, according to the American Medical Association estimated that less than three.

Scott and Lorrie Covington, owners Vapin “in the Cape at the Del Prado Boulevard South, and also refused to order that some users are called” analog “or traditional cigarettes in favor of the electronic variety.

E-cigarettes have increased from one-time fax cigarettes with weak batteries started appearing in stores a couple of years ago. Next Generation Battery is sold in tobacco shops. It includes rechargeable, battery-operated heating element, removable cartridge, which usually costs the liquid nicotine and injectors, which when heated, converts the contents of the cartridge into a vapor.

The first whiff of a couple in the industry – is growing, according to the Tobacco Association of the electronic cigarette vapor, and, of course, willing to challenge the financial interests of the cigarette companies – came in November 2010 when they ordered the starter kits on the internet and even tried to method gives a cigarette.

“Between us, we carried out was a car payment every month,” said Lorrie Covington, who said that she smoked two packs of cigarettes a day for 15 years and tried to e-cigarette “lived with Robitussin on the bedside table.”

Scott Covington smoked a pack a day for 25 years.

When the starter kits ran out of battery and liquid nicotine, the pair said there was no place to refill them. They ran to the store and bought a cigarette again.

Thus, the former owners of information technology products and began researching the market and eventually went into business for the sale of devices and liquid nicotine in the tobacco flavors fruit, candy, desserts, coffee, soft drinks and mixers. Counter was first back in 1991 Honda Accord, then a local flea market.

Covington’s opened a brick and mortar stores, and recently had to expand to a larger space where they have five people, all former smokers.

Most users do not know of a thin cord and pipes, as the device is hanging around his neck.

“It’s almost becoming a cult,” said Lorrie Covington.

Several users have reported using the device in stores without consequences, since the exhaled vapor barely noticeable and do not smell of cigarette smoke.

Vaping heavily regulated, although the FDA, through the courts trying.

The prevalence of medical organizations support the regulation of FDA, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, American Medical Association and the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

But for this, FDA should use its authority under federal law, food, medicines and cosmetics regulate “tobacco products” because nicotine is used in the liquid is extracted from tobacco leaves. He tried to sanction manufacturers claims based on electronic cigarettes as drugs or devices. But a federal appeals court ruled that the FDA can not claim jurisdiction over the devices if they are not sold as a therapeutic.

These legal differences are overshadowed in disarray, aggravated by claims that electronic cigarettes contain antifreeze.

A similar compound, propylene glycol, can be found in some of the liquids used in the devices, depending on the manufacturer and several independent sources. This is a food additive used in the pharmaceutical and dental materials, which can be used to reduce the freezing point of water, but it is not ethylene glycol antifreeze is toxic substance that is poisonous to humans and animals.

FDA asked manufacturers to cooperate in the field of standardization of components; the task is complicated because the components are often imported from other countries.

“Because of the clinical trials of safety and efficacy of these products have not been submitted to the FDA, at the present time, consumers have no way of knowing whether e-cigarettes are safe for their intended use, the types and concentrations of potentially harmful chemicals found in these products or how much nicotine they inhale when they use these products, “says FDA published in cigarette fumes.

But local doctors call their patients who want to quit talking and Justin Covingtons Braatz, owner of Downtown couple of Boy Scout to drive to Fort Myers.

Bratz, 41, smoked cigarettes for 24 years before moving to different pairs. He said he had tried to quit smoking, including the “patch, gum, candy.” While retailers can not claim a pair of cigarette smoking cessation aid, in their opinion, the results speak for themselves.

“I know people who smoked for 45 years, I embrace, because they are so happy they were not cigarettes,” Bratz said. Smokers start with the fluid force, depending on the number of cigarettes they go through the day. The diagram on the Vapin “recommended in the Cape from 16 to 18 milligrams of liquid nicotine in a pack a day smoker.

The goal for the majority of smokers is a cone down the concentration of nicotine over time. Liquids that are labeled as containing no nicotine at all are also sold.

Angela Wynn, small-business owner who lives in Cape Coral, said she was without a cigarette for almost three months. She is 42, and tobacco, since she was 15.

“I’m one of six family members who are not so close,” Wynn said. Lemon blueberry cotton candy and peanut butter flavors are her favorites.

Neither store allows any user to the 18th century.

California cigarette tax

Down by 63,000 votes, the initiative to be voted for a $ 1 per pack tax on cigarettes has been largely abandoned to die in the night on June 5 at Primary Election. Then, the election workers throughout California started counting the countless stacks of ballots – more than a million of them, mostly by mail within a day or two before the election or transfer to the polls.

The gap in the vote on the tobacco tax, Proposition 29, has started to narrow. And narrow. On Friday night, the margin of defeat was reduced to 16,778 votes – or four-tenths of 1 percent. “I think we’re still definitely in it,” said Jim Knox, California Division American Cancer Society, one of the main supporters of the Yes campaign 29. “In any case, it looks like it will be coming as the result of the vote in recent history -. If you do not ever”

Knox remains cautious for good reason. This measure was back on 29,000 a week ago, 42,000 on Thursday and then fell to the smallest gap on Friday. But the chances of 29 winning campaigns are taking off for a long time: about 52 percent of the remaining 436,000 countless ballots must contribute to measures that would fund research into cancer and anti-smoking campaign. The proposal has reached or exceeded the level of support in only 16 out of 58 counties in California.

“It’s not very likely, not if he gets the vast majority of the outstanding ballots in districts where it feels very good,” said Stephen Weir, Contra Costa County registrar of voters. In countless ballots were counted, some of the biggest gains came from large districts, where support for tobacco taxes received strong support, including Alameda, Contra Costa and Santa Clara. The measure also took land in San Diego County, where he is still behind by 1 percent. The measure took a minute increase – 0.2 percent – in voter-rich Los Angeles County, where she continues to lose by 1.2 percent, election figures show.

A spokesman for 29 campaigns is not funded by the tobacco industry, said the campaign was happy to remain in “such a good position.” “Coming out of the election night with 60,000-plus vote lead, we always felt in a good position to hold on and be successful when all the votes are counted,” said Beth Miller. “We do not see anything at this point, to lead us to believe anything else.” Counting may continue to fluctuate until 6 July, the deadline for county elections officials to provide certified results. After the official announcement of the results, every voter has the right to demand a recount, but requests must be made by counties and paid by the person making the request.

Proposition 29 will add $ 1 per pack tax on cigarettes to raise about $ 860 million a year to study tobacco-related diseases and prevention programs. The American Cancer Society and cycling champion Lance Armstrong, cancer survivor, was one of the biggest supporters of this measure, raising more than $ 11 million to support the ballot initiative. Tobacco giant Philip Morris USA and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company poured nearly $ 47 million in “no” campaign and joined the fight against tax and business groups.

Fluctuating counts are common in a few weeks after Election Day, and countless ballots are processed and updated from time to time, countries. Some registrars to wait until all ballots are counted, to report their voting update, others do it as they go. “Having received through this experience before, I always caution against making bold predictions of victory or defeat, until it is mathematically impossible for any other result,” said Democratic political consultant Brian Brokaw.

Brokaw worked as a consultant for the campaign of the democratic state Attorney General Kamala Harris, DA in 2010, when Harris defeated Republican Steve Cooley, Los Angeles District Attorney, by less than 1 percentage point. Cooley, in effect, declared victory on election night. A few hours after he walked on stage in the Beverly Hilton Hotel to deliver the news, Cooley was back. Over the next three weeks, 2300000 more ballots were counted, the leading switches back and forth, until Harris finally pulled ahead for good.

“The vote will swing in the hundreds, sometimes thousands,” Brokaw said. “We were careful never to get our hopes too high.”

Regardless of the outcome, the fact that the initiative in tobacco taxes accounted for a significant ground after the Election Day drew attention to the campaign and election experts.

Figuring out what sways postal voters was decisive: almost half of the votes into a ballot by mail. Some speculate that they may be younger or busy parents a little free time, and their voices of liberal tendencies. Others believe they may have been swayed Yes 29 campaign ad, which aired at the end of the campaign.

“There’s a lot that happens in campaigns at the end. There are probably more people who are still waiting,” said Secretary of State Debra Bowen, the chief elections official in California.

Bowen dismissed the conventional wisdom that conservatives usually sooner-mail newsletters and liberals end. As you can see, she says, is that most partisan Republicans and Democrats tend to send their ballots early, because they make up their minds early on.

Late ballots tend to reflect the results of the traditional polling stations, she said.

With regard to the apparent end of the surge proposal 29, it does not express an opinion. Too many factors were in play, she said, the new “top two” primary system, counties, and millions spent on independent campaign expenditures.

“Was it a pizza or a beer that caused you to gain 15 pounds during their first year in college?” she joked.

Law: Youths cannot possess e-cigarettes

Kansas lawyers have decided that e-cigs shouldn’t be sold to people younger than 18 years old, so starting with July 1 it will not be permitted to possess or buy vapor- emitting version of cigarettes.

Gov. Sam Brownbanck singed the measure because of Legislatures passed ban. The lowers confirmed that electronic cigarettes are battery-powered device that can provide inhaled doses of nicotine through e-cigs filter.

Leavenworth County prosecutor Todd Thompson said school resource officers had expressed concerns about students who possessed e-cigarettes, some designed like pens or flash drives.

Also Thomson confirmed that school districts can provoke their personal prohibiting of electronic cigarettes on schools property, but the student weren’t aloud to use them.

Thomson mentioned that electronic cigarettes are as harmful so addictive because of nicotine

The FDA has mentioned some doubts and concerns about electronic cigarette product and Thomson said that he didn’t want children to be addicted to nicotine that’s why he is a gree with Kansas lawyers.

“We are about trying to nip things in the bud,” Thompson said.

State Alcoholic Beverage Control Director Doug Jorgensen said the law prohibits anyone from selling e-cigarettes to anyone younger than 18, just like the law regulates the sale of real cigarettes.

Under the law, vendors who are licensed to sell regular cigarettes won’t have to make any changes to their current license. “Allowing kids under 18 that exposure to pure nicotine, which can be addictive, we just needed to take a look at controlling it,” Jorgensen said.

Trudy Cooley, a spokeswoman for Safer Smoke Supply of Leavenworth, said the law won’t affect her company’s business because it prohibits the sale of e-cigarettes to anyone younger than 18.

She said that includes sales on the company’s website and through its vendors.

“It’s not because they are harmful,” Cooley said. “We just don’t need to promote this to kids. This is a safer way for people to smoke, and we don’t want kids just trying it for the heck of it.”

CBO: Raising taxes on cigarettes

Federal excise taxes are sometimes seen as a panacea for state aid, causing the much-needed revenue, discouraging bad behavior.

Some lawmakers and human rights organizations for many years considered the excise tax on motor fuel, alcohol and tobacco in particular, for underwriting the cost of elixirs worthy of government programs and prevent excessive movement, drinking and smoking, which are harmful to the environment and bad for your health.

But recent studies show that there are sometimes unintended consequences of raising the federal excise tax, and state policy makers do not always get the results they expect or hope.

“They pitched and sold as such income hubs, which should reduce the deficit and reduce debt astronomically and just never really loses”, PJ Austin, an analyst at advocacy group Citizens Against Government Waste, said Tuesday. “What you end up seeing that they often distort the market and drive customers lower taxes, or places to places that have no tax at all.”

Example: Children’s Health Insurance Program extension of the law was signed into law by President Obama in February 2009 to provide benefits for the health of children from poor families. The program will be funded by raising rates on the federal tax on cigarettes from 30 cents per pack to $ 1.01 per pack – in effect, forcing the tobacco industry to pay for expanded federal health care programs.

But the April report of the Government Accountability (GAO) found that the largest manufacturers of tobacco escapes tax burden increase cigarette production by moving other tobacco products that are subject to lower tax rates.

Manufacturers of cigarettes was reported to easily avoid the full impact of the excise tax increase, because the law was vague in differentiating between classes of products that should have been taxed at the new high speed and those that will continue to be taxed at a lower rate. For example, a large increase in the excise tax on roll your own tobacco and cigars has led to a small increase in production – and popularity among consumers – of pipe tobacco and big cigars.

GAO found that as a result of these market changes, excise taxes is much less revenue than originally projected. Between 2009 and the end of fiscal 2011, the Ministry of Finance raised $ 40 billion income tax increase as a result of a cigarette. However, during the same period, according to GAO, the Treasury lost between $ 615 million and $ 1.1 billion in federal revenues due to the producer and the consumer transition from roll your own tobacco, pipe tobacco.

Yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office released a report speculating on its strength increasing the federal excise tax on cigarettes even more.

The study raises the question of how the government will save health care costs and how much revenue it can raise to offset the budget if the tax on cigarettes and cigars, little was raised to 50 cents per pack – to $ 1.51 – and taking into account inflation.

The federal government spends a staggering $ 1 trillion a year on health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and Children’s Health Initiative. “So it’s easy to imagine that policies that promote a healthier population may have a significant impact on the federal budget,” said CBO.

Think again.

Of course, the average annual health spending per capita will be reduced because of improvements in health due to smoke less, the study said. As a result, the cost of major federal health programs would be lower for several years, than they would otherwise.

In the long term, however, less federal spending will be higher for retirement, and federal health programs, as an increase in the number of beneficiaries due to increasing longevity outweighed the decline in the average federal spending on health per capita.

The expected improvement in the overall health of Americans will increase revenues by increasing revenue, partly because people can work longer than they would otherwise, according to a study CBO.

Analysis of the CBO assumes that the increase in excise tax on cigarettes by 50 cents per pack would reduce the federal budget deficit will total $ 42 billion by 2021, or about $ 4 billion a year. There may be some other positive effects of income for the state in terms of additional income and payroll taxes generated by the expanded number of healthy workers in the labor force.

But most importantly, CBO said: “Taken together, the health effects of an increase in federal excise taxes on cigarettes will produce a small net deficit reduction over five years and a very small increase in the deficit in the future.”

In short, do not get too excited.

Electronic Cigarette Company

Electronic cigarette company based in Peterborough marks further success and growth, moving to its own new premises to accommodate all the new shares. Electronic Cigarettes Ltd, House ECigWizard.com, UK and ELiquid Neatcigs, had previously been housed in four separate units totaling 2,500 square feet of their new premises now occupy over 10,000 square meters, which consists of a mixture of office and warehouse.

Electronic Cigarettes Ltd started life less than 18 months ago and has since gone from strength to strength. With just one employee and costs £ 500 shares, when they started, they began to have 13 employees and achieved a turnover of £ 2 million in the first 12 months. Over the past 18 months have been somewhat of a vortex of electronic cigarettes Ltd and the success they have experienced so far looks set to continue, more and more smokers to convert these healthy alternatives.

They are also due to launch another brand later this summer. Currently shipping out of about 500 orders per day, they have a large customer base in the UK, but it is certainly not confined to this country, 40% of their orders actually leave the rest of Europe, in countries such as Germany and Finland, as well as many other clients at the international level.

Electronic cigarettes are battery-powered alternative to conventional cigarettes, which do not contain nicotine, but none of the other unpleasant and harmful chemicals such as resins, which are in tobacco cigarettes. The electronic cigarette works by evaporation of the electron liquid, which is, which contains nicotine and is available in more than 200 flavors in the bottle, which is then inhaled and exhaled as water vapor. Whitmore, these devices can be used indoors and is much cheaper alternatives, not to mention a lot healthier.

Although the Electronic Cigarette Company mainly e-commerce business, there is a place in their new shop front premises, where local customers can look to buy all their requirements of electronic cigarettes. Launch party is also scheduled to take place in late summer, where customers and the public will be invited to see what happens behind the scenes.

Electronic Cigarettes Ltd also just create a wholesale scheme, where other aspiring entrepreneurs who are interested in the development of retail electronic equipment, cigarettes and accessories you can buy these and then go on to sell them himself.

It is believed that an unprecedented number of smokers switching to electronic cigarettes to accelerate the speed, so when you take that into account also the fact that the Electronic Cigarette Company shares of the various products of superior quality and provide excellent customer service, it is not difficult to understand why they have experienced so much a success.

Electronic cigarettes are a new tool to quit smoking

Adam Davis was smoking nearly a pack of cigarettes a day for 10 years. In 2010, Davis, in Millville, was given a starter pack of electronic cigarette. A month later, a hot country program director for 107.7 only smoking electronic cigarettes, and two months after smoking the electronic cigarette, he gave up smoking completely and currently smoking one and a half years.

Like Davis, more smokers are turning to electronic cigarettes – also known as electronic cigarette or e-cigarettes – as a way to quit smoking altogether, according to an article published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. In fact, more people in the United States looking for electronic cigarettes on the Internet than any other alternative to smoking, nicotine and smoking cessation product, according to the article. Electronic cigarettes look like conventional cigarettes appearance and use. The electronic cigarette contains nicotine and other chemicals that turn into vapor inhalation.

Most electronic cigarettes operate on rechargeable lithium batteries, as well as new cartridges can be purchased at most places that distribute tobacco products and the Internet.

Davis said he still has a craving for another cigarette from time to time, but the electronic cigarettes to help him out after the cessation of other products failed. “I felt that the main thing (smoking electronic cigarettes) did change their smoking habit because it makes it easier for me to get out,” he said. “I tried to quit several times before, with the help of patches and Chantix. It seemed more relaxed approach.” Another former smoker, Liz Davis, no relation, in State College, Pennsylvania, started smoking electronic cigarettes, when they went on sale at the Sheetz gas station where she works. She smoked regular cigarettes for about a year in advance.

After a month of smoking electronic cigarettes, Davis said she had no more desire to smoke regular cigarettes. Four months later, she gave up smoking completely, although it is to keep electronic cigarettes on hand in case of need. She said she would recommend to people smoking in the workplace as a way to reduce their intake of toxins, but she also said nicotine in electronic cigarettes are still bad for the body.


Article from American Journal of Preventive Medicine was founded on the Boston University Medical Center study conducted by the authors, Michael B. Siegel, Kerry L. Tanwar and Kathleen C. Wood. The full article can be found at http://www. ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797 (10) 00792-0/fulltext. The study consisted of 222 participants who smoked electronic cigarettes for six months. Of all smokers, 31 percent had quit smoking regular cigarettes, the study said.

Of those who quit smoking regular cigarettes, 56.7 percent were using electronic cigarettes, 9 percent use tobacco without nicotine and 34.3 percent were nicotine-free, the study says. In addition, 66.8 percent of smokers reported reducing the number of cigarettes smoked per day after smoking electronic cigarettes, the study said. The conclusion was “e-cigarettes may have promise as a method of smoking and that they merit further study using more rigorous study design,” the study says.

FDA skeptical

Due to the lack of clinical studies on electronic cigarettes, Food and Drug Administration says it does not recognize them as recommended smoking cessation product. Electronic cigarettes contain ingredients that are toxic to humans, FDA says.

The FDA also says that electronic cigarettes can be attractive to children and bring them to the use of other tobacco products. Electronic cigarettes fall under the category of “tobacco products” in accordance with Federal Law Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act because they contain nicotine. This gives the FDA the right to establish rules for the electronic cigarettes in the future. The FDA recommends alternative electronic cigarette smoking, including prescription drugs and over-the-counter products such as patches, nicotine lozenges and nicotine chewing gum.

California cigarette tax proposal sunk Big Tobacco

The influx of money from tobacco companies leads to a shift in the electorate to vote against the proposal cigarette tax

California Proposition 29 ballot initiative to add $ 1 tax on a pack of cigarettes, has failed to work in the state ballot on Tuesday. The vote was so close; it took more than three days to determine the outcome. That vote was so close, both sides were divided by 53,000 votes out of 3.8 million ballots cast on Thursday, said the powerful impact of cash in swaying voters.

In March, a statewide poll of 67 percent of Californians supports a tax that will fund the cancer and tobacco-related health research. The proposal was majority support in all age groups and political affiliations. But as the date of the vote approached, and the money from Big Tobacco glove, voter attitudes began to change.

March 1, the cost of those who are against it, to support 29 was $ 9 million, depending on the application state elections. From March 1 to May 18, they spent $ 40 million.

It costs coincided with a significant shift in the electorate in moderation. May 23 poll, published in the same group, non-partisan Public Policy Institute of California showed that support for Prop 29 has fallen 14 points in March.

The opposition has raised more than $ 47 million, or 96 percent of which came from the big tobacco companies and their subsidiaries, according to campaign finance nonprofit MapLight. Although exact figures are not expenses will be available until July, it is safe to assume that it is not 29, the main opposition groups have continued to spend heavily in the last few weeks before the vote.

“Tobacco companies will not spend more than $ 40 million during this period, not having received what they wanted, they seek a return on investment,” said Daniel Newman MapLight. “This is extremely spent on advertising to convince California, not necessarily to teach their proposals.”

Pro-Prop 29 coalition led by the American Cancer Society and the Lance Armstrong Foundation, $ 12.3 million spent only about one quarter more, as against.

However, the rejection of Prop 29 was not entirely due to the money, said Shaun Bowler, a professor of election and voter behavior at UC-Riverside.

“The intuition is that advertising has been effective,” says Bowler. “But there were these other things that she spoke, a kind of prevailing winds, and went to Big Tobacco, this time.”

On the one hand, the turnout was relatively low and relatively conservative, so the electoral bloc was predisposed to be against the new tax. On the other hand, the group to “no” vote by any initiative in a better position, since they only need to manage to raise doubts in the minds of voters. As a result of the initiative is not 60 percent of the time, says Bowler.

However, the large discrepancy of cash, coupled with a simultaneous shift in voter opinion, it is difficult to ignore.

“Of course, this is no accident,” says Newman. “The resources on both sides were very unbalanced; voters do not even get information.”

Tobacco tax does not pass

California ballot initiative to raise the tax on cigarettes, which pitted the high costs of tobacco companies from cycling legend Lance Armstrong and the mayor of New York was after the end of Wednesday morning.

Proposition 29 failed to pass by a little less than 3 percent.

The blizzard of industry-funded radio and television advertising over the past two months have reduced the gap in an attempt to impose an additional $ 1 per pack tax on cigarettes to fund cancer research.

In March, a statewide poll suggested that the measure will pass, with the approval of two thirds. But support has slipped below the percentage of the vote with more than three million ballots.

With millions of votes have not thought it could be days or more before the winner is declared.

Trying to hike taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products have become a national anti-tobacco companies pouring millions into an effort to suppress and celebrities urge voters to support him.

Taxes on tobacco products have been proven to reduce smoking. But opponents said the initiative to create an inexplicable bureaucracy and hurt the economy by sending taxpayers’ money rose in California to other states.

Additional tax in the country’s most populous state could also mean big losses for the tobacco companies.

Both camps said Tuesday night that they expected a close race and was confident.

“It will be a long night, and this is what we expected,” said Beth Miller, a spokesman for the campaign is not 29. “It was a question of voters to take a look and decide what they really do not want to support this measure, but it also stems from the fact that people usually do to support cancer research.”

Proponents promise tax revenues will remain in California and said tobacco companies had to invent arguments to hide their true motives – to ensure profits.

“We were ahead the whole night, and we expect to stay ahead,” Jim Knox, the American Cancer Society said on Tuesday. “I think that public health has received a message through the smokescreen of the tobacco companies have nearly $ 50 million campaign of disinformation.”

Armstrong and the Coalition for Tobacco Control group raised about $ 18 million to support the measure. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg gave $ 500,000 to the campaign to help offset the industry donations.

The tax would generate about $ 735 million a year, according to the independent legislative analyst’s office.

Voters on both sides of the issue firmly on Tuesday beliefs.

“I think we should actively smoking – make it less convenient, making it more expensive,” said Susan Hayman, a Democrat, who cast her ballot at a polling station Long Beach.

In the neighboring city of Glendale, Craig Jerpseth, 43 year-old nurse was equally confident in voting down the measure, along with anything or anyone who may mean more taxes.

“I hope we get more taxes. This is pretty much it,” he said.

Many newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times, oppose the action, declaring their unwillingness to join the tobacco companies. They argue that the proceeds should go to the State that Governor Jerry Brown announced last month, now faces a deficit of $ 16 billion.

With the smoking rate of 12.1 percent, California did not raise these taxes since 2000. If the measure passes in California is still only the 16th highest tax rate in the country.

Cigarettes Industry Attractive to Investors

In times of economic uncertainty, investors are turning to companies with strong earnings and high dividends. The cigarette industry is known to have one of the safest dividends in the market.

During the last recession, which saw many companies cut dividends, cigarettes, tobacco companies held strong. Report Paragon is considering investments in the industry and ensures the validity of cigarettes study Lorillard Inc. LO 0, 85% and Reynolds American, Inc RAI+1, 78%. In the S & P 500, which is currently four companies for the production of cigarettes (Altria Group, Reynolds American, Lorillard and Phillip Morris International). The average dividend yield of these companies amounts to almost 5 percent, easily beating the average S & P dividend yield of 2.61 percent.

Tobacco companies continue to face tax hikes in the U.S. because they are often blamed for rising health care costs. The recent proposed tax hike in California will see a jump of excise tax by $ 1.87 per pack. Tobacco companies such as Altria Group and Reynolds American have spent more than $ 40 million on lobbying against the tax. Paragon produces regular updates on the report of the industrial market cigarettes so investors can stay ahead of the crowd and make better investment decisions to maximize their profits. Take a few minutes to register with us free at www.ParagonReport.com and get exclusive access to our numerous reports stocks and industry newsletters.

Lorillard, through its subsidiary, Lorillard Tobacco, is the third largest producer of cigarettes in the United States. The company currently offers investors a dividend yield of about 5.01 percent. Lorillard was previously reported that it has acquired all the assets of the blue e-cigarettes, the U.S. electronic cigarette (electronic cigarette) company for $ 135 million in cash. Reynolds American is currently offering investors the dividend yield of about 5.64 percent. The company recently added a “transformation of tobacco” for the website to inform visitors about the strategic framework of the company. The new section is devoted to three key pillars of the transformation of Paradise: Commercial integrity, tobacco harm reduction and prevention of youth tobacco use.

Paragon report contains market is concentrated in stocks that offer opportunities for growth, value and great potential for profit. We strive to provide the most advanced work in the market. We constantly create research reports and newsletters to our members. Report of the Paragon is not compensated by any of the aforementioned companies. We act as an independent portal for research and understand that entails all the investment risks.

The tax on cigarettes

California ballot initiative that pits the high costs of tobacco companies from cycling legend Lance Armstrong and the New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg was too close to call Tuesday night.

In testimony to the power-month onslaught of radio and television campaigns funded by the tobacco companies, Californians were divided on whether to slap an extra $ 1 per pack tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products to fund cancer research.

The measure was nearly 51 percent of the vote, with more than 2 million ballots. Public Policy Institute of California found that support for the initiative has fallen from 67 percent in March to 53 percent by the end of May.

An attempt to increase cigarette taxes in the state’s most populous country has attracted nationwide attention, with the tobacco companies pour millions of crush force and celebrities urge voters to support him.

Taxes on tobacco products have been proven to reduce smoking. But opponents said the initiative to create an inexplicable bureaucracy and hurt the economy by sending taxpayers’ money raised in California to other states. Additional tax in the state would also mean big losses for the tobacco companies.

Both camps said Tuesday night that they expected a close race and was confident.

“It will be a long night, and this is what we expected,” says Beth

Miller, a spokesman for the campaign is not 29. “It was a question of voters to take a look and decide what they really do not want to support this measure, but it also stems from the fact that people usually do to support cancer research.”

Supporters said that tax revenues will remain in California and create jobs. They said tobacco companies have come up with arguments to hide their true motives – to ensure profits.

Patrick Reynolds, grandson of tobacco company founder RJ Reynolds and CEO TobaccoFree.org, said Tuesday night that he felt confident and was glad to see the measure eke out a narrow lead.

Armstrong and the Coalition for Tobacco Control group raised about $ 18 million to support the measure. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg gave $ 500,000 to the campaign to help offset the industry donations.

The tax would generate about $ 735 million a year in revenue, according to the independent legislative analyst’s office.

At polling places around the state Tuesday, voters on both side of the issue expressed strong convictions.

In the sleepy site survey in Long Beach, attorney Susan Hyman gave her vote for a new tax on tobacco products without hesitation.

“I think we should actively smoking – make it less convenient, making it more expensive,” said Hyman, a Democrat.

At almost refused a polling station in a parochial school in the Los Angeles Craig Jerpseth, 43, said he was voting against anything or anyone who may mean more taxes.

“I hope we get more taxes. That’s a lot,” said the nurse, Glendale.

Many newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times, oppose the action, declaring their unwillingness to join the tobacco companies. They argue that the proceeds should go to the State that Governor Jerry Brown announced last month, now faces a deficit of $ 16 billion.

With the smoking rate of 12.1 percent, California did not raise these taxes since 2000. If the measure passes in California is still only the 16th highest tax rate in the country.

Up in smoke

One of the problems of costs provided for the vote initiatives is the difficulty in making midcourse corrections. If the cost goes astray, it can not be solved as easily as the cost of the bill enacted by the Legislature. This is one of the reasons we oppose such a “ballot box budgeting.”

An example of what can go wrong, involves government initiative that raised tobacco taxes to fund, among other things, smoking cessation efforts. In 1988, the proposal 99 added 25 cents per pack of cigarettes. The official ballot summary said the money will be spent on disease research, fire safety, environmental protection and “school and community-based health education programs on tobacco.”

Office of the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst reports that the 99 proportional to raise $ 289 million per year, of which $ 50 million (17 percent) “is used to fund tobacco prevention programs.”

In 1998, Proposition 10 tobacco taxes 50 cents a pack – $ 489 million a year – for the first five programs for the financing of the state commission and district commissions devoted to “early childhood development and smoking prevention programs,” said the official summary of the voting. Eighty percent of the funds go to the county committees, which decide how to spend. The State Commission receives 20 percent.

Where does the money go?

In 1998 tobacco Master Settlement among the 46 states and cigarette manufacturers brought California $ 22 billion to spend on people who suffer from tobacco-related diseases and anti-smoking programs.

But things did not work out as planned, according to a new study by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “State tobacco revenues as compared to tobacco control appropriations -. The United States, 1998-2010”

Summary report of the Sacramento Bee stated, “In 2010, California spent about $ 79 million for tobacco control efforts, about 18 percent of what is recommended by the federal to have a significant impact on public behavior.” And the money comes only from the tobacco settlement, only a 6 percent was directed to “ban tobacco and educational programs … far below the federal spending for the effective containment of tobacco consumption.”

Now there is a proportional 29 to June 5 vote. This would increase taxes on tobacco $ 1 per pack of cigarettes, raising about $ 735 million a year. This initiative, according to the official summary of the ballot “required tax revenues deposited into a special fund for research” in cancer, heart disease and other smoking-related diseases and prevention programs.

We act for private, non-tax-funded efforts to reduce tobacco use. In addition, it is a matter of personal freedom. Despite the knowledge of health risks, many people prefer to smoke in any case.

In addition, we are not surprised by the fact that taxes are not targeted to where the voters were told that it will go.

California voters face against the tax on cigarettes

California has some of the toughest anti-smoking laws in the country – it is illegal in some places, smoking in his own apartment – and boasts the second lowest smoking rates per capita in 50 states. But despite all the disdain for smoking here, it was 14 years old California raised taxes on cigarettes, a tribute to the power of the tobacco industry here and the weakening of the rule of the State Tobacco ants.

This may be about to change. An array of health and anti-cancer groups has rallied around a ballot initiative to introduce a $ 1-pack tax to fund cancer research. Current tax at 87 cents for about half the national average, and has thirty-third in the country. Go to the increase in tax raised $ 47 million ad storm, the vast majority funded by the tobacco industry, which is outspending proponents by nearly 12:56 to win the greatest threat it has faced in more than ten years.

An independent poll released two weeks ago, the signal power of the attack: While the majority of California voters still say they support the proposal 29, as is known, the proportion decreased markedly since the beginning of the campaign, according to the Public Policy Institute of California poll. Voting will take place on Tuesday. The last line in the fight against smoking is very unlikely place: a state that has long been identified with advocates restrictions on smoking.

The battle has attracted national attention – Mayor Michael Bloomberg in New York amounted to $ 500,000 initiative, and Lance Armstrong, cycling champion and cancer survivor, became its chief public defender – reflects the disappointment in the anti-smoking groups by their defeat here. The legislature rejected more than 30 attempts to raise taxes on cigarettes in 30 years.

“Do you think that in California, as a healthy, progressive state a leader in smoking cessation’’ said Chris Leman, one of the organizers for the initiative.” It’s just not true. And it’s not for lack of trying.” Dominance in California as the leading state anti-smoking significantly decreased, as it was in 1998 that was during the toughest anti-smoking law in the country, according to the American Cancer Society. Since then, 23 countries have passed stringent laws. Cancer Society has contributed more than $ 7 million to get the proposal passed 29.

“California has become a leader not only in the country, but in the world in efforts to combat smoking,” said John R. Seffrin, executive director of the society.” They’re overdue.” Tax that would raise an estimated $ 735 million is currently the vote, as California has recovered from a new wave of bad news budget. Governor Jerry Brown said last month that the state is $ 16 billion deficit, and suggested a sharp round of spending cuts to deal with it.

But none of the $ 735 million will go to close the deficit. The organizers claim that the tax would be less likely to pass if voters thought that goes into the state treasury, and said that their only purpose here was to reduce smoking. Increasing the value of tobacco was the most effective way to stop smoking, especially among teenagers.

Poll suggests close elections, the tax on tobacco products

Measure the California ballot that proposes to add $ 1 tax on a pack of cigarettes has a slight eight points in the survey field survey with less than a week to go on Election Day. The results are published on Thursday showed 50 percent of likely voters backing Measure the June 5 ballot, and 42 against and 8 percent were undecided.

Field Poll director Mark DiCamillo said the findings suggest that the proposal could see the support 29 to fall in coming days that will reflect the previous two fights voting for higher taxes on tobacco products in the most populous U.S. state. “Since he was eight points better than even chance of passing, but it will be close to the election,” said DiCamillo.

Field survey results are in line with the results of a recent survey conducted by the Institute of Public Policy in California. It was found 53 percent of likely voters say they will vote for the measure, 42 percent say they will vote against and 5 percent were undecided.

In March, a survey institute found 67 percent of likely voters support Proposition 29, which indicates that the advertising blitz of the tobacco industry successfully expressed their concern about the actions of the voters. They are the vast majority support the idea of raising taxes on tobacco products, but advertising is no doubt about whom will control the revenues raised by Proposition 29, it will be, and whether it will remain in California.

The measure will increase the tax on a pack of cigarettes California to $ 1.87 for the financing of medical research, tobacco-related diseases and programs to prevent tobacco use. The money will be under the supervision of the nine members of the committee, which includes three University of California chancellors, three directors of Cancer Research Institute, a physician associated with an academic medical center and two members of the disease advocacy groups that focus on tobacco-related diseases.

Field survey results also suggest consuming industries on television and other advertising undermined support for the measure. “At the time of the survey of the field shows that voters who have already sent a mail ballot, or plan to do this before Election Day support for Prop. 29 to the edge of a ten (51 per cent to 41 per cent). However, support is narrowed to just five points among those who going to vote at their polling precinct on 5 June, “the survey report said.

“This suggests that the weight of the advertising campaign and the late decision narrows the side edge and so may have an additional effect above all votes cast,” the report said. DiCamillo noted that California voters in 2006 rejected a ballot measure offers $ 2.60 tax increase on a pack of cigarettes by 52 percent to 48 percent – after the measure carried a substantial early lead in the polls.

California voters last approved a measure to increase state tobacco taxes in 1998 and only narrowly by 51 percent to 49 percent. Field poll a week before the election, taking the measure of nine points, compared to 22 points in previous surveys. The Field Poll, conducted its latest survey from May 21 to May 29. His conclusions are based on responses from 608 likely voters in the elections in June that were interviewed in English and Spanish on landlines or mobile phones.

The maximum sampling error estimates for the survey results based on a sample of potential voters, plus or minus 4.1 percentage points to 95 per cent confidence level.